User talk:Muelder

June 2011
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Death of Osama bin Laden. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please discuss this material on the article's Talk page before attempting to reintroduce it to the text. Alan the Roving Ambassador (talk) 22:57, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

NPOV
Re your edit on Navi Pillai, remember to phrase them encyclopedically and reference them. More help for quotes is here WP:QUOTE and some guidance on citations WP:CT if you need it. That way your edits are more likely to be retained. Best wishes. Cpsoper (talk) 08:00, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

December 2015
Your recent editing history at Los Angeles International Airport shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. HkCaGu (talk) 17:59, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Rsrikanth05. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Cheetah, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. ''Please do not add links to irrelevant youtube videos. --'' Rsrikanth05 (talk) 18:03, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Spamming advancedbionics.com
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Cochlear implant. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Jytdog (talk) 19:41, 1 June 2018 (UTC)