User talk:MugenDarkness

MugenDarkness, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

May 2015
Hello, I'm Random86. I noticed that you made a change to an article, TVXQ, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Random86 (talk) 06:50, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at TVXQ, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Random86 (talk) 07:51, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at TVXQ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 08:44, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to TVXQ. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 08:45, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

MugenDarkness here, regarding about the page TVXQ, i edit about the sales of record sold to date. I think you should edit it from 10 million to 14/15 millions. It was stated by Oricon and Gaon Chart during early 2012/2013 that TVXQ sales that period is about 12 millions already. Plus,TVXQ sold more than 1 million album in Japan alone during 2013 and another 1 million in Japan (2014) and around 400 hundreds thousand in Korea(2014) thus make it already more than 14 millions/around 15millions. I checked Wiki around october last year and it stated more than 14million sold to date. I checked it again in march this year and it come out 10 millions suddenly lol. Did wiki not update or just incorrect about the current situation? or what...by the way, the page said that TVXQ is one of the best selling Kpop act,NO! TVXQ is THE BEST SELLING KPOP ACT..so you better solves this matter soon..another method to solves is calculate it yourselves.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Random86 (talk) 09:31, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at TVXQ. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 09:35, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Your addition to TVXQ has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Do not reinsert copyvio text from http://www.kpopstarz.com/articles/189570/20150403/tvxq-japan-dome-tour.htm Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 09:44, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 17:57, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Kuru  (talk)  19:01, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to TVXQ while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of more than one account or IP address by one person. If this was not your intention, then please always remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Random86 (talk) 15:57, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. 5 albert square (talk) 21:56, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 15:39, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Edit warring at TVXQ
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. The full report is at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Continued warring. This is your third block since May 1. EdJohnston (talk) 18:47, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (List of the best-selling boyband in the world) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating List of the best-selling boyband in the world, MugenDarkness!

Wikipedia editor Kudpung just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"There are major citation errors.Please clean them up and also address the naked URLs"

To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

September 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Boy band, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Krystaleen  14:18, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:17, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List of the best-selling boyband in the world


A tag has been placed on List of the best-selling boyband in the world, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  Krystaleen  16:26, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you.  Krystaleen  16:45, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:11, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Krystaleen. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:17, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Thats bcuz that user seems like a troll rather than editors, that user claim her / his own " expereince " is more legit than anything , and to think that an editor use their own expereince to edit Wiki page is laughable.


 * See WP:Assume Good Faith, a cornerstone of this site. Krystaleen has been an upstanding editor for three years, so calling  a troll is only going to further justify blocking you.  Just because you refuse to understand  does not mean 's a troll. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:54, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Ok what i mean by that is someone like 3 years old editor to doubt and decline a legits fact and instead use their own so calles " experience " to edit Wiki page is really laughable. the fact is there and legit, prove , source , common logic are also provide and apply to this whole situation. one experience doesnt differ the whole reality

When someone say this person is great in subjects and smart, but based on what ? If that person got A+ then its legit

− − −

in this situation, that user claim F4 ( lmao ) is popular in Asia , based on what ecxactly ? Hype ? Lmao

− −

TVXQ is popular in Asia and Worldwide, proof ?

− −

Well ,

− − −

- TVXQ gathered 393,000 concertgoers in Asia alone

− −

- TVXQ is praised high directly by Backstreetboy in fact. I got a prove and link to that

− −

- TVXQ broke countless Bon Jovi, The Beatles , The Carterpanters and many others records

− −

- TVXQ is the only Asia artist to be invited to Michael Jackson Tribute, Repreasent the WHOLE ASIA

− −

- TVXQ song is officially featured on Fast and Furious

− −

- TVXQ is the best selling foreign artist in Japan ( The World 2nd largest market )

− − −

stop, its goin to be an essay. this is what i call prove and FEAT not just " experienced ", Rumors and HYPE. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MugenDarkness (talk • contribs) 18:21, 1 September 2015‎ (UTC)

Repost of List of the best selling boyband in the world
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you.

Twice deleted at Articles for deletion/List of best-selling boy bands (2nd nomination) & speedied today at List of the best-selling boyband in the world (with a hyphen). Continually making small changes to the title doesn't make it acceptable, and looks like deliberate deception. --David Biddulph (talk) 17:59, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of the best-selling boy bands in Asia


The article List of the best-selling boy bands in Asia has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Same problems as these previous lists this same editor created: List of the best selling boyband in the world & List of the best-selling boyband in the world which have been deleted. Also similar lists has been deleted multiple times in the past: Articles for deletion/List of best-selling boy bands (2nd nomination)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Krystaleen  03:17, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of List of the best-selling boy bands in Asia for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of the best-selling boy bands in Asia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of the best-selling boy bands in Asia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Krystaleen  04:02, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 04:51, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Assume good faith
I posted this at the AfD, but I want to ensure that you read this. Please assume good faith from other editors. At the AfD and on the article's talk page you accuse Krystaleen of being "jealous" and a "hater". These statements are seen as WP:ADHOMINEM, personal attacks against Krystaleen and are not tolerated on Wikipedia. You have already received three temporary blocks for disruptive editing and if you continue to edit with this tone, you will receive another block, one that has a very strong chance of becoming a permanent block from editing. This is your last warning. If you want to keep your pages you will need to provide satisfactory evidence, which I've gone over at the AfD. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:16, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:16, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I've looked at your edit history and I notice that you've been brought to 3RR on three separate occasions. I'm going to block you indefinitely because to be very honest, I don't see where you've learned anything from the previous blocks or from the warning you got at the last 3RR interaction. Personal attacks are not tolerated and given that you were already given some notice at 3RR that your recent interactions would warrant a block, I think that we've given you enough WP:ROPE already. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:15, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

So You ignore the fact too, HA done here. I understand now the reason people told Wiki page is irrelavant and take it as a JOKE. ***** your *******. DONE
 * I have to warn you: if you continue to make nasty comments on your talk page, you can have your talk page access revoked, which will make it difficult for you to get unblocked if you were to have a change of heart in the future. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  10:03, 8 September 2015 (UTC)