User talk:Mugzyandmax

Proposed deletion of Walther Berthold Raster
Hello, Mugzyandmax. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Walther Berthold Raster, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Walther Berthold Raster to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Müdigkeit (talk) 00:40, 28 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Howdy, and welcome to Wikipedia!


 * I have removed the above tag as it relates to biographies of living people - the subject passed away in 1944. However, the article still has major issues and the subject may not meet the criteria for inclusion in Wikipedia where are set out at WP:GNG. You should have a read and try to determine if the subject meets the criteria. You should also be conscious of some of Wikipedia's other guidelines like WP:COI and WP:OWN. I have made a number if changes to the article. Please let me know if you need further assistance. Cheers, Stalwart 111  (talk) 05:10, 28 September 2012 (UTC).

Nomination of Jovan Nikolic for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jovan Nikolic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jovan Nikolic until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Edmund Jüssen
Hello ,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, Edmund Jüssen, may be copied from http://www.wisconsinhistory.org/wmh/archives/search.aspx?area=browse&volume=12&articleID=6746. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 05:57, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I look at the article and removed the material and rewrote it so that should take care of any copyright problems-thanks-RFD (talk) 11:23, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

A word on copying content
Hello, Mugzyandmax, and a belated welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:58, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Daniel Pope Cook, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Mears. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2014
Hello, I'm Epeefleche. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Epeefleche (talk) 06:05, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mickey Edelstein
Hello, Mugzyandmax. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Mickey Edelstein, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Mickey Edelstein to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Sulaimandaud (talk) 07:39, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

August 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=620039122 your edit] to Paraguay may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:31, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * December 2007 |postscript=}} (see translator's note)
 * Latin America, and the third-fastest in the world (after Qatar and Singapore). CIA [https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2003rank.html?countryCode=&

Nomination of Christian Raster for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christian Raster is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Christian Raster until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 17:02, 7 May 2018 (UTC)