User talk:Muhammad A. Saman

Speedy deletion nomination of Md. Robiul Azam
Hello Muhammad A. Saman,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Md. Robiul Azam for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 08:25, 2 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello John!
 * So two years ago I tried to publish an article on a person, Md. Robiul Azam, which had been scheduled for speedy deletion. I understand that the article might have seemed like an advertisement for a person, but in reality the person is a newly renowned social activist who I had thought deserved a page on Wikipedia. I understand that there were not enough citations or proofs of his activities regarding his relevance to being in Wikipedia, and it was because my citations were not strong enough. I apologize for my mistakes and would like to ask if I could submit another article on him with proper citations of his work such that it would get published. I am writing this because I feel like his actions have earned him the credibility to be involved in a Wikipedia page. Please let me know as soon as you receive this. Thank you! Muhammad A. Saman (talk) 15:22, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Md. Robiul Azam


A tag has been placed on Md. Robiul Azam, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:31, 19 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello Spiderone!
 * So two years ago I tried to publish an article on a person, Md. Robiul Azam, which had been scheduled for speedy deletion. I understand that the article might have seemed like an advertisement for a person, but in reality the person is a newly renowned social activist who I had thought deserved a page on Wikipedia. I understand that there were not enough citations or proofs of his activities regarding his relevance to being in Wikipedia, and it was because my citations were not strong enough. I apologize for my mistakes and would like to ask if I could submit another article on him with proper citations of his work such that it would get published. I am writing this because I feel like his actions have earned him the credibility to be involved in a Wikipedia page. Please let me know as soon as you receive this. Thank you! Muhammad A. Saman (talk) 15:22, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Md. Robiul Azam.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Md. Robiul Azam.jpg, which you've attributed to source unknown, not uploader; no proof of stated license. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add permission pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 15:50, 15 May 2024 (UTC)