User talk:Muhammad Hamza

'''Write me a message here  |   Email Me   |   Sandbox   |   IRC WP Help   |   just talk to me god damn it !

article assessment
help Few months back, I tried some application that gave suggestions for an article to make it better. I tried it on Tablighi Jamaat and it told me that the lead section is short. The problem is that i forgot what that application was, what was it's name, and how did i use it? Can you kindly help?Hamza [ talk ] 18:45, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I always find this tool hard to find and helpful :). Hope that is what you were looking for. - Kingpin13 (talk) 19:04, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Article Protection
I worked a lot on MQM but fanboys mutilated it very frequently. I got fed up and so asked around people to put it on their watchlist at least. Multiple people put it on their watchlist so I concentrated on Tablighi Jamaat to complete it first and then return back to MQM. This artice is very frequently mutilated. Is their anyway I can ask for protection of article from newbie user edits. May it be for some months?
 * The place to ask for protection is WP:RFPP, but they will need to see that there is current vandalism, articles are not usually protected as a precaution. There are instructions on that page. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 20:05, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Askimam.org as a reliable source
help Askimam.org is a website run by a Mufti. Can i use content of his fatwas as a credible source for Tablighi Jamaat. Hamza [ talk ] 07:42, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * After an IRC chat, I have determined that this is almost certainly reliable. — Ed   (talk  •  majestic titan)  08:28, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

User help
help What qualifies a user to be eligible to respond to tags? Hamza [ talk ] 18:51, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Whether or not you know the answer to the question. Beyond that anybody can-- Jac 16888 Talk 18:56, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Junaid jamshed.jpg
I uploaded a file named Junaid jamshed.jpg a long while back. But it was deleted without anyone informing me. It was a free image. Can i see its discussion about deletion? Hamza [ talk ] 21:42, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * If you click on this redlink [[File:Junaid jamshed.jpg]], you will see the reason for deletion: it seems that under the non-free use policy, pictures of living persons are not allowed. If you want, you can ask the deleting admin, about this. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 21:49, 18 January 2010 (UTC)


 * But it was a free photo. How was it assumed to be non-free?Hamza [ talk ] 22:00, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Most likely, it was mislicensed. It's best to ask the deleting admin in this case.  fetch  comms  ☛ 22:04, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * "Non-free content" is a complicated area: read WP:NONFREE. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 22:19, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

TJ

 * 1) REDIRECTTablighi Jamaat

Potentially false information in reliable source
What should one do if the information provided in the reliable source is potentially false. Should it be tagged with some template? Is there any relevant template? I cannot find any in WP:TC. I am specifically referring to article Sultan Rahi. This guy surely made many movies, but whether he was included in Guinness Records is not confirmed yet. I found a source from Dunya TV but i believe it may potentially be false as imdb shows many actors with more prolific work. But they have not defined the prolific. I mean in terms of movies, or soaps etc. Hamza [ talk ] 22:02, 19 January 2010 (UTC)


 * I've posted it on WP:RSN here .-Hamza [ talk ] 04:25, 20 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi Hamza, I have replied to your post in RSN. --Defender of torch (talk) 06:10, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

any talk tag
Is there any way to know that the message you posted on someone's wall talk page has been responded?  Hamza  [ talk ]  09:43, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * If you click the "Watch" tab at the top of the other user's talk page, it will be put on your "watchlist"; then, any time you click on "my watchlist" you will see a list of which pages on your watchlist have been altered. You can take a page off your watchlist later by clicking the tab at the top which will have changed to "Unwatch". JohnCD (talk) 10:02, 26 January 2010 (UTC)


 * I once heard of a tag something like or something like it. Do you know anything about that? Do you know how it works?  Hamza   [ talk ]  15:49, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Template:Talkback  Hamza  [ talk ]  15:54, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Toyota Century Royal deletion
I've reverted your edits, as said material is not a violation of Wikipedia guidelines. From my understanding, the main issue is linkage to copyrighted works, which includes TV clips and Movie shots not uploaded by the copyright holder. Clearly, the user-submitted works were shot by said uploaders who hold the copyright and have made the videos available for viewing. You would be right if I had added links to video clips from TV news broadcasts or TV documentaries. Since these are personal videos, they don't exactly violate Wikipedia guidelines. --293.xx.xxx.xx (talk) 20:13, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Help with new article
Thanks for the comments, please fell free to help me clean things up. I know I need to go back and clean up the cites some more.

Enhanced Editing Toolbar
I was using the original wiki and it worked fine. But now in Wiki Beta, i cannot see the enchanced editing toolbar that i enabled from Preferences>Editing. —  Hamza  [ talk ]  05:45, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The tools and layout vary from scheme to scheme. I would suspect you will have to go back to the monobook skin - I didn't like beta either.  Ron h jones (Talk) 19:21, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

3RR note
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing at Aafia Siddiqui. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.Off2riorob (talk) 12:00, 4 February 2010 (UTC)


 * I don't mind where your posting, you are reverting other editors edits. The warning is to politely ask you to stop doing it. Off2riorob (talk) 12:07, 4 February 2010 (UTC)


 * And you should probe the case before putting up a warning.—  Hamza  [ talk ]  05:09, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Mitchell Wiggs
Hi, im not sure if you get a notification that i wrote you back or not so i wanted to write you a direct message to let you know i replied on my talk page...i think lol

Vipimp3 (talk) 01:07, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Final discussion for Requests for comment/Biographies of living people
Hello, I note that you have commented on the first phase of Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

As this RFC closes, there are two proposals being considered:
 * 1) Proposal to Close This RfC
 * 2) Alternate proposal to close this RFC: we don't need a whole new layer of bureaucracy

Your opinion on this is welcome. Okip  03:22, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Pashalik of Yanina
Please do not continue reverting back and forth; rather, discuss this civilly on the talk page of that article. Thank you. f o x  (formerly garden) 12:00, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Re:Tablighi Jamaat
Yes, I'll review the article in accordance with the Good Article Criteria and post my comments on the review page, whereupon you and other editors can work on the article, if necessary. The review will be up by this weekend. Regards, SBC-YPR (talk) 08:40, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Squads box
Greetings! Hamza, i think you mean squads box. I think National field hockey squad will help you. If you think it is hard for you to understand the syntax, try to look at Category:Argentina national field hockey team templates, simply browse one and have a look. Good luck! :) --Aleen f 1 05:11, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Congratulations!
Thank you for your hard work on Tablighi Jamaat. Following an excellent copyedit on the suggestions provided, I have now passed this article as a Good article, and updated the various talk page templates to reflect this.

That also means you get one of these:

which you may like to place on your user page (or somewhere suitable) by copy/pasting   into the page code.

All the best! Regards, SBC-YPR (talk) 08:09, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

sort mqm page pls
hamza, can you please give that page sometime. i have seen whole section blanking go unnoticed Sarmadhassan (talk) 08:18, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Great Run
Hi Muhammad. The Great Scottish Run isn't actually part of the "Great Run" series and is not organised by the same group. Obviously, Great Run is a very generic term and other competitions unrelated to the better known events are held in the UK, another example is The Great West Run. I intended the template to be for events run by the Brendan Foster group. Regardless, both these other events may well be worth creating articles for. Certainly the Great Scottish Run has received coverage in the national press and had wide public participation as well as elite runners in attendance (typically the three main things I look at when determining whether something is worth writing about.

I've been creating quite a lot of these types of article – it's something that was not previously well covered on Wikipedia and there are still plenty worth writing. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. Cheers! Sillyfolkboy (talk) (edits) Join WikiProject Athletics!  09:32, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm an occasional runner – more 10K kind of guy rather than marathons or anything too serious. Definitely running for pleasure, but that doesn't mean I don't compete for time with myself! I think quite a few of the athletics editors here are runners as well. Strangely, it was my interest in athletics that started my running rather than vice-versa. You do anything yourself? Sillyfolkboy (talk) (edits) Join WikiProject Athletics!  13:57, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the week-long delay! Marathons usually require you to sign up for them but typically do not have any special requirements. More popular races might ask you to run for a charity as part of the occasion. Whether the Edinburgh Marathon does this - I have no idea.
 * I would highly recommend that you do a shorter race first (10K/5K/etc) to get a feel for long distance races. This will help you know where you're at running-wise and prevent any disappointment that may come from heading straight into a marathon unprepared. Shorter runs are quite rewarding in themselves and will help you mentally prepare for the great slog which is the marathon! Sillyfolkboy (talk) (edits) Join WikiProject Athletics!  08:24, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Umar
I have noticed that you have requested citation for the changes I have made to the page: Umar. Please refer to online sources for my input at: [] This is one of the many pages that attest to the fact mentioned by myself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Msamirm (talk • contribs) 07:30, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hamid Abdul


The article Hamid Abdul has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * the actual name is Abdul Hamid. Which is actually Abdul Hamid (field hockey)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —  Hamza  [ talk ]  00:43, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Munir Ahmed Dar
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Munir Ahmed Dar, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Munir Dar. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:00, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Help for Article Aisha
I request you to kindly put in your effort to organize and improve the article Aisha as due to regular changes and reverts by users had made it a mess, Kindly help as you helped for the artice Tabligi Jamat Thanks--Omer123hussain (talk) 06:51, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Aalmi Majlis Tahaffuz Khatm-e-Nubuwwat


The article Aalmi Majlis Tahaffuz Khatm-e-Nubuwwat has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability, no third-party refs

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. William M. Connolley (talk) 15:18, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

User Profile
Hamza Bhai:

I was just going through your most interesting profile. Alhamdulillah you have got excellent knowledge!  I just made one minor correction: « plathora of subjects » is incorrect. It should read as « a plethora of subjects ».

Ramzan Mubarak!

Wassalam,

Khurram Lall Kissimmee Florida USA

Kslall8765 (talk) 11:54, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Tablighi Jamaat
That looks fine to me. Being a major contributor to a page doesn't mean you are trying to take ownership of it. I had a look at the history of the page and there are plenty of other editors contributing to it. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 06:30, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

WP:PAK
Hello! You look like someone who might be interested in joining the Pakistan WikiProject and so I thought I'd drop you a line and invite you! We'd love to have you help us :-) lTopGunl (talk) 00:18, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

From your user page
Dear Muhammad Hamza,

My name is also Muhammad Hamza and I am actually a fan of Microsoft. I have applied to their company and I am sure during a Google search they will come up with this page. There is a 100% or greater chance that they would think I am the one who has written this profile and maintain it. I would request you to please remove anti Microsoft messages from your profile. Help out a brother who is looking for a job. I would be highly obliged to you.

Thanks.

Yours sincerely, Muhammad Hamza — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.25.111.3 (talk • contribs)


 * Thank you hamza for contacting me. I find this situation a little amusing. I am sure that Microsoft is intelligent enough to realize that you are not the same Muhammad Hamza. Have you been student of business and engineering? If not then this statement in first section of userpage is enough for them to realize that they've stumbled upon the wrong page. —  Hamza  [ talk ]  03:48, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Your kind response needed
Hello, this is another mate on the English Wikipedia. If i'm posting in wrong place then sorry but i'd appreciated your comments. I'm requesting your comments as i feel some false accusation are being made without reliable sources in some Islam related articles that were created by a single editor User:BengaliHindu. Specially, i found this article 2013 Canning riots with lots of bias and false accusations against Muslims where Muslim clerics were murdered yet blames goes to local Muslim people. May be i'm wrong but it may also possible that such articles were created per Islamophobia. I believe Wikipedia should be free from personal feelings or views and articles on sensitive topics need extra care to maintain a NPOV. I'd deeply appreciate your comments and advises. Best Regards,  Mrwikidor  ←track  16:51, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Help required
Dear Hamza,

My name is also Muhammad Hamza and I'm an MBA student looking to make it big in the tech sector. However when I Google my name the first result that pops up is your Wikipedia profile page which disses Microsoft. I was notified by a recruiter that is a huge point when considering my application for work. I humbly request you to please take down the points (or reword them in kinder ways) that diss Microsoft.

Thanks, Hamza

PS: You can contact me through this page (it's the contact page for my blog): http://www.thetrueperspective.com/p/contact.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.104.183.67 (talk) 21:10, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

PPS: Just read your previous response. Like I mentioned above, I am an MBA student. I was notified about this page by a recruiter and even though I clarified my position I don't think it went down too well with him. So once again I humbly request you to please take down or change your statements. Thanks. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.104.183.67 (talk) 21:12, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Javed Kodu


A tag has been placed on Javed Kodu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Epeefleche (talk) 14:07, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Assalaamualaikum
Thanks brother for your efforts on Tablighi Jamaat Article. I am really impressed. sorry I hadn't responded to your previous request to review it (almost 4 years ago), I am on a wikibreak and hardly do edits. As I had enough of some of the highly opinionated contributors :-) Në&#359;&#924;&#466;&#324;&#287;er  Talk to me 11:56, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Hello Netmonger, I stumbled upon your edits related to Islam and it saddens me that know that your presence on WP is diminishing if not totally absent. I hope you find the time to return soon. Good luck in whatever you're engaged in now. Regards—Sadat ( Masssly ) ❤Talk☮C☺Email☯ 21:48, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Assalaamualaikum Brother,

Thanks for your encouragement, I know I have been completely absent from wikipedia, insha allah I will try to be back. -- Në&#359;&#924;&#466;&#324;&#287;er Talk to me 09:33, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fazail-e-Sadqaat


A tag has been placed on Fazail-e-Sadqaat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ScholarM (talk) 06:45, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity
Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)