User talk:Muhammad yasir.80

Mirza kanaa Ghulam of Qadian proclaimed himself to be a mujadid then a "a prophet" Promised Messiah, Mahdi and Prophet of the age. (Note that the two subcults of Mirza Maloon qadiani interpret this last claim very differently). He claimed to have fulfilled the prophecy of the return of Jesus. and according to hindus krishna any religion that was expecting return he was that..

His cult which was later on given the name of "Ahmadiyya Cult" by his people Since its inception, the Ahmadiyya Cult have said they want revival. Which contradicts what hadith's and prophecies of our beloved .. Please note these people refer to themselves as 'Ahmadis' were as we would rather refer to them as Qadianis.. Because mainly they follow Mirza of Qadian

Soon after the death of Mirza Maloon, the movement split into two cult's over the question of the Finality of Prophethood. The Lahore Ahmadiyya Movement affirmed the interpretation that there could be no new prophet after Syedina Muhammad and viewed itself as a reform movement. Exactly don't ask me what they came to reform? perhaps' moving away from using a hole in the ground? to a toilet that flushes? The Ahmadiyya, however, claimed that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad had indeed been a prophet (albeit a "non-law-bearing" one) and that mainstream Muslims who rejected his message were guilty of disbelief. The question of their leadership was also an issue in the split of the Ahmadiyya Cult. The Lahore Ahmadiyya Movement believes that an (Body of selected people) should be incharge of the dajjali cult. The Ahmadiyya Cult, however, believes that Caliphs are appointed by God and they are incharge. (Please not their hypocrisy here, as they feel that Imam Mahdi should be selected by them and not as Divined and according to the prophecy of Islam)

Both Ahmadi and Qadinai cults support their belief by using an allegorical interpretation of the references in Islamic literature related to the "return of Jesus". However there is a difference between the two sects as far as finality of prophethood is concerned:

Since both groups claim to be the true inheritors of the mirzas dajjali legacy and since the two groups have radically different interpretations of his mumbo jumbo, the term can be quite ambiguous. Ahmadis claim that Muslim critics of the non Muslim Ahmadis cult often fail to note the important distinctions between the groups, treating all non muslim "Ahmadis" as non muslim "Qadianis". quite simply one group says he is prophet and other says he was a mere reviver, never the less Mirza was kafir and the Muslim ummah is united on this! as per say of his own claim 'i am a prophet and recieve wahi' so whether you belive either cult your doomed!! remember the prophecy of syedina Muhammad 'My Ummah will never be united under falsehood'

p.s it better to refer to them all as Qadinais as it seems to really annoy them..

October 2012
Hello, I'm TruPepitoM. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Mirza Ghulam Ahmad because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. TruPepitoM Talk To Me  11:57, 29 October 2012 (UTC)