User talk:Muhammadahmad79

Not currently under discussion Topics which have not been edited for last 7 days are moved to "Not currently under discussion" section. However, If there will be any edits made to any topic under this section, then that topic will be moved to "Currently under discussion" section.

  General Discussions

Stop POV pushing on Sherwani
You have recently deleted a lot of content on the Sherwani page, and replaced it with your POV. Wikipedia is not meant to promote one's own POV rather for presenting facts. Use talk page for Adding the content on the page next time, don't engage in edit wars. Barthateslisa (talk) 17:46, 27 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The Article was full of false and unsourced information which merged the two different dresses with different origins namely sherwani and achkan. All I deleted was the unsourced content and all I added were the common facts with some sources. - Muhammadahmad79 (talk) 11:21, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Astrology in medieval Islam
Thank you for. I was rather surprised to receive a notification that my previous edit had been undone by you, but pleased to note on visiting the history page you had realised your error and corrected it. Self-correction is one of the good things about Wikipedia. Happy days, LindsayHello 08:48, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Thankyou! very much for your appreciation, it truly means alot for me. :) - Muhammadahmad79 (talk) 09:01, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Awan
If you add that crap to the Awan article again, I will make sure you are blocked for disruption. - Sitush (talk) 15:25, 13 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Why are you calling it "crap"? Is it just because you don't want it on the article? I tried to address all your concerns and most of the time I thought they were not even legitimate but I still tried to address them all. I am just adding the majority's view on the Subject with reliable sources. If you think they are not reliable then please do point it out and if you think they are biased then please see WP:BIASED. does this "make sure" means that you will try to use your influence over the administrators to get me blocked? It does not suite a wikipedia editor to threat another editor, please read WP:AOBF.--Muhammadahmad79 (talk) 16:06, 13 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Re blocking - I know when something is pretty much inevitable. In your case, it should happen now & there are at least three experienced contributors who are very fed up of your antics. You have had numerous warnings and attempted provisions of advice, none of which seem to have changed your disruptive behaviour. - Sitush (talk) 19:21, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

  Invites/Notices

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

 * Sorry to say, but I think that your judgement is completely wrong and you have indulged in Abuse of Power. --Muhammadahmad79 (talk) 11:12, 18 June 2020 (UTC)


 * And I'm sorry to say that you obviously created a sock puppet a matter of minutes after this account was topic banned.

Currently under discussion

July 2020
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bishonen &#124; tålk 10:47, 26 July 2020 (UTC)