User talk:Muirofsara

Add comments below

Ancient Canaanite Religion
was changed from BCE to BC in March, before then it had been BCE for over a decade. Please don't change it back to BC again. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 18:19, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

What on earth are you on about? I can see from the history that you're just making up stuff! Are you trying to intimidate me or something? You Doug Weller made a revert on 2nd January while the article was in a BC state and had been for ages before that - and left it as BC afterwards. You should be so good as to return it to how I left it. Muirofsara (talk) 21:43, 7 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Wow, talk about ignoring WP:CIVIL and assume good faith. It was in a mixed state - don't tell me you missed the BCE? And more importantly, how could you miss the [[WP:LEAD which clearly says " early Bronze Age through the first centuries of the Common Era." That was added in March 2011. It's had BCE in it since, although some people have added AD dates, presumably not noticing the lead or the other BCE dates. You need to calm down and stop making personal attacks. Doug Weller  talk 12:14, 8 July 2020 (UTC)


 * I have looked through the history and I see that it has been predominantly BC for the whole of the last 9 years. (Nothing of any significance happened in March.) Also I notice the the quote from the lead you state there was actually inserted by you and it is unsourced as well. It should probably be tagged or removed. I believe that you have judged articles in the past as having to stay as BCE articles because they have been predominantly BCE for a long time and cannot be held to be BC even though this is their starting format. This obviously applies in reverse to this article. I think it is best to transfer this to the talk page for the article.--Muirofsara (talk) 13:27, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

British?
Can you please explain why you are changing lots of articles to say "British" rather than "Scottish" or "English"? AlistairMcMillan (talk) 19:55, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Changing how? If you are referring to a look through my editing history then you should have looked closer before jumping to conclusions. A great deal of my editing in this line is reverting unjustified POV alterations by other editors or anonymous IPs that make such changes, and in many cases almost always without an edit summary to explain the basis for the change. My edits have explanations so that should already be covered. I am not "changing" the articles, rather "changing them back".--Muirofsara (talk) 11:52, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry
You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Muirofsara. Thank you. AlistairMcMillan (talk) 00:39, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Mevagiss. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Cabayi (talk) 16:36, 17 April 2021 (UTC)