User talk:Mulage9

October 2020
Hello Mulage9. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to RDS (group of companies), gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mulage9. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.  scope_creep Talk  14:41, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * what kind of nature of my edits gives you such impression? I promised to update a little bit the article about RDS and I did it by providing better links. What is wrong with that? As living in Ukraine I'm familiar with this company and decided to improve it. --Mulage9 (talk) 12:49, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
 * The amount of time you have spent on it, considering you only arrived on the 8th, the day after Afd was posted and the posting up of those dodgy references. Who did you promise to update the article?   scope_creep Talk  14:11, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
 * the amount of time doesn't correspond with the nature of my edits. I promised to myself to help this article, as I see unfairness here. Why dodgy references? You are too emotional. I cannot talk like this anymore. P.S. I appeared on wikipedia not on 8th of October. Check here: --Mulage9 (talk) 10:00, 22 October 2020 (UTC)