User talk:Mulaohu

July 2009
Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, see: If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write   below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! -- Avi (talk) 20:49, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on spam
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Actuarial science has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.  7   talk   14:08, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Actuary link
Please do not add that link any longer, it is not appropriate per wikipedia's policies on reliable sources, WP:SPAM, and external links. You have now been informed of this a few times. Please review wikipedia's policies on disruptive editing and edit warring, and take note that further disregard of wikipedia policies and guidelines may result in measures being taken to protect the project, which include, but are not limited to, article locking, and temporary or permanent loss of editing privileges. If you have any questions, feel free to drop me a note on my talk page. Thank you. -- Avi (talk) 14:36, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi. We are discussing the link here Talk:Actuary. Thanks! -- Avi (talk) 20:38, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

email notice
The advice given on this page says it is better to leave a message on your talk page. However, you are new to Wikipedia, and may not even know what that means. In the interest of transparency, I'll send the exact same message to both places.

It's my belief that you were honestly trying to improve Wikipedia. While I understand the actions taken to remove your contributions, I can understand if you view the actions in a negative light.

I'd like to see if there is something we can do to help.

I see two possible avenues - one would be to address some of the concerns about the page you linked. As that is not a Wikipedia page, we could discuss that by email, up until the point we think there is something appropriate for linking. The second option (as suggested by one person) would be to discuss how you could add material to the Actuary article itself, about the actuarial world in Malaysia. I'd be happy to discuss that, but such discussions should take place on your talk page and/or the Actuary talk page.

Let me know if you would like to pursue this.

SPhilbrick -- SPhilbrick  T  17:37, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice... i hope i am doing the proper way now. Thanks for all the explanations and i think i am starting to understand more on how the wikipedia works. And I clearly see how my website doesn't fit to the Wikipedia because it is my purpose to make my actuarial website sounds personal and private, in order to differentiate from those official actuarial website. I really appreciate all the feedbacks! For my website, i will start looking into revising the grammer mistake, and if time permit, i will see what i can do according to your advice! Thanks Mulaohu (talk) 19:56, 23 July 2009 (UTC)