User talk:MultiAlphaZ

Welcome!
Hello, MultiAlphaZ, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Doug Weller talk 10:35, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Please also read this
WP:NOR - in your case, it means that you should not "surmise". Not an unusual error for a new editor however. Doug Weller talk 10:36, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Hi MultiAlphaZ! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 10:37, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

February 2024
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Darius the Mede. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. tgeorgescu (talk) 02:37, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Darius the Mede. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. tgeorgescu (talk) 02:38, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

June 2024
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Artaxerxes I, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Lone-078 (talk) 15:22, 4 June 2024 (UTC)