User talk:Multipz

'''Why Hybrid App Vs Native App Had Been So Popular Till Now? In the world of mobile app development, we’re always looking for shorter development cycles, quicker time to deployment, and better app performance. In between, choosing the right platform for mobile app development is always challenging and confusing.

There are three main options for creating a mobile app. You can create a native app, a hybrid app or a mobile responsive website which offers similar functionality to an app. But here we are going to discuss main two platforms for mobile app – Native app and Hybrid app which are more likely now a day.

Native apps are specific to a given mobile platform (iOS or Android) using the advanced tools and language that the respective platform supports (e.g., Xcode and Objective-C with iOS, Eclipse, and Java with Android).

In a simple language, a native app is designed to run on a specific mobile operating system. It won’t run on other mobile operating systems. So, for example, if you were going to develop a native app for iOS you’d do the development in Swift or Objective-C.

Native apps are usually developed using an integrated development environment (IDE). IDEs provide tools for building debugging, project management, version control, and other tools professional developers need.

Pros & Cons of Native App:

As we all know Native applications are developed for a specific platform and installed on a computing device usually from an online app marketplace. App also has its strengths and weaknesses.

Pros

●   Native apps are that they can normally access all the functionality of the chosen device easily and that they are more likely if developed properly, to run without error on the device.

●   Native apps have inbuilt wider functionality of the device including a camera, accelerator, etc, to deliver the most effective presentation and rich user experience along with superior performance.

●   Native apps can run in an offline mode i.e. without an internet connection.

●   Each native app must get the approval of the app store, so the security and performance of the app are generally assured. Because native apps are associated with an app store, they also are easy for a user to find and download.

Cons

●   The biggest disadvantage is native app cannot be run on a device which doesn’t utilize the same operating system. That means if you want your app to run on other devices (Windows, iOS 7, and Android), you’re going to have to develop the app, once for each operating system.

●   Native apps generally cost more to make than hybrid apps. This can make the development process both slower and more expensive.

●   The process of getting an application approved by the App Store is long and tedious; updates also have to be App Store approved to be featured there.

●   Users of different mobile devices may be using different versions of the app, which makes it difficult for the developer to maintain and offer support.

Hybrid applications are, at a core, websites wrapped in a container use a translation layer to provide access to some native mobile features.

A hybrid app is designed to work on multiple platforms. It’s written using a single standard code language such as C# or a combination of HTML5 and Javascript and then compiled to be executed on each platform.

The hybrid development combines the best or worst of both the native and HTML5 worlds. We define hybrid as a web app, primarily constructed using HTML5 and JavaScript, that is then wrapped inside a thin native container that provides access to native platform features. Phone Gap is an example of the most popular container for creating hybrid mobile apps.

There is also some other platform like ionic, NativeScript.

Device specific interactions will normally be managed by the use of plugins for that operating system.

Developer augments web code with local SDK. Can be effortlessly sent over a different stage and is normally the less expensive and faster solution.

On iOS, the embedded web browser or the UIWebView is not identical to the Safari browser. While the differences are minor, they can cause debugging headaches. That’s why it pays off to invest in popular frameworks that have addressed all of the limitations.

Pros & Cons of Hybrid App:

The hybrid application works well with straightforward ideas. Hybrid applications have advantages and certain limitations too.

Pros

●   A major advantage that hybrid mobile apps can offer is the unified development. A user can develop just a single version and let their hybrid framework of choice do the heavy lifting and ensure that everything will work flawlessly.

●   This leads to lower cost of development and fast app development.

●   Hybrid apps don’t require many developers to do the job. This may be important if speed to market is a significant factor in your app development project.

●   Hybrid apps don’t require developers to learn any of the specific languages for iOS or Android.

●   If your company has a BYOD policy, hybrid applications are typically a great option for you, as they are multi-platform. This means that you can use the app on a variety of different devices.

Cons

●   Hybrid apps have to use some general elements of navigation not typical for any of the platforms.

●   Newer features are often not supported on Hybrid frameworks until the company releases support for the newest operating systems.

●   Hybrid apps are slower and less productive due to technical limits. Many developers make the mistake of simply copying their web applications to mobile without redesign. This can result in a slowdown in page load time make less responsive and certain components not being optimized for mobile and users notice that.

●   Hybrid tools are still relatively immature and greater risk of rejection from the app store.

Both hybrid and native approaches can get the job done but there are certain considerations that end of the day a native should be understood right off the bat. Each approach has its pros and cons but at the end, approach will have the biggest benefits for a company’s bottom line.

Now, You will easily decide which one platform is best for your needs or requirements to fulfill that.

Conclusion

Mobile development is a constantly moving target. Every six months, there’s a new mobile operating system, with unique features only accessible with native APIs. The containers bring those to hybrid apps soon thereafter, with the web making tremendous leaps every few years. Based on current technology, one of the scenarios examined in this article is bound to suit your needs.

I hope you all guys like this article. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/why-hybrid-app-vs-native-had-been-so-popular-till-now-hitesh-khunt?trk=v-feed&lipi=urn%3Ali%3Apage%3Ad_flagship3_profile_view_base_recent_activity_details_shares%3BoZmBGzPeOL%2BN4Caodf7ojA%3D%3D