User talk:Multiverse Guy

 Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Multiverse Guy! My name is Jonathunder. I just wanted to say howdy and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or press the "Request Help" button at the bottom of this message. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or press the "Request Help" button below. Again, welcome!

Recent edits to List of most massive black holes
Hi, Multiverse Guy! I appreciate how you are trying to help in expanding the list of most massive black holes, but your recent edit placing Holmberg 15A back to the top and your reason is maybe a misunderstanding. If you read the reference again (it's on page 10), the authors clearly state that Holmberg 15A hosts a black hole of "only" 10 billion M. Your reason quoted is actually the range of the five figures on page 15, the larger three of which is unclear.

To be honest, I felt very sorry for introducing Holmberg 15A with the 170 billion value, which created a small Citogenesis on the web. My mind was very drowsy when I put it on the list.

You can delete this message if you want. If you have any comments, go to my talk page. You are always welcome! SkyFlubbler (talk) 11:35, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

July 26, 2015
Hello, I'm SkyFlubbler. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. SkyFlubbler (talk) 06:26, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Holmberg 15A
Again, page 4 of reference says 10 billion. Why are you always putting the 170 billion value? SkyFlubbler (talk) 14:53, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Big Rip
For the Big Rip to occur in 22 billion years, the formulators' equation states that a dark energy value of w must be 1.5. (see the Big Rip article). The Chandra data give an estimate for w at 0.991, or very close to 1. According to the formulators of the Big Rip, the closer W is to 1, the farther in the future the Big Rip will be.  Serendi pod ous  11:37, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

August 2017
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Petr Čech. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:02, 12 August 2017 (UTC)