User talk:Mum Bot

Talk Transferred to Admin
Discussions transferred to admin.

Test.. Mum Bot (talk) 04:12, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Please read and note: I am not the user Some1asks, who I read was criticised for (under wiki protocol) allowing a Permitted Care Worker (Employed Personal Assistant), to, "as was said" use the account, IDENTIFYING AND SAYING CLEARLY THEY WERE using the account on their needing assistance employer and identified as writing on their behalf, as Wiki guides, and no security was breached as someone else noted. Some1asks even cited National and International law, preventing disability discrimination under United Nations Convention on the Rights of Disabled Persons; Enshrined under Treaty Obligation into National laws (some 20 years old, some 8 years old. I have assisting the person, and travelled nationally and internationally at his side, some times helping with specific information relay (computer graphics or film footage). Things are known to both of us as individuals, working so closely, so as we've worked eons together almost all over the globe, we gather shared data. If 'I' Mum Bot (as I'm like a mother to them in some physical typing or reading things), but the term annoys them, I was setting up an identity as directed as, non breach of security access, notified to editors as per wiki protocol, we were both horrified at our perception of a hyperteaction, whilst following instructions. ANY malicious action would not have had a written explanation as per wiki guidance, and when an identity for me was created by me, as per cririsisms. I too was not treated fairly, justly or humainly, neither of us. Please understand our situation and permit proper talk access and edit access.. PC, Laptop, Tablet and SmartPhone, which we share as I as Personal Assistant, Guardian, share the technology, just like Prof Hawking. Mum Bot (talk) 04:54, 1 June 2016 (UTC) Mum Bot (talk) 04:54, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * AS this was not clearly considered, I the employed PA set up my own personal account, as critics wanted. BUT Having directly followed Admin instructions it may have been misunderstood, despite the above information,

VERY Important, now returned from conferrence.
Please read and take note of all, before jumping to conclusions, please:

I am not the user Some1asks, who I read was criticised for (under wiki protocol) allowing a Permitted Care Worker (Employed Personal Assistant), to, "as was said" use the account, IDENTIFYING AND SAYING CLEARLY THEY WERE using the account on behalf of their needing assistance employer, and as per notes provided at the time, as as per Wiki Protocol, the assistant as identified as writing on their behalf, as guided, and no security was breached, 'as someone else noted clearly'. Some1asks even cited National and International law, preventing disability discrimination under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Disabled Persons; Enshrined under Treaty Obligation into National laws (some 20 years old, some 8 years old), plus laws under treaty obligations of continents and enshrined in their national laws.. I the employed PA set up my own personal account, AS CRITICS WANTED, despite wiki permissions giving declarations (as was done). BUT Having directly followed these 'senior editors' requests, some described troll like behaviour continuing. Following direct Wiki and Senior Editors instructions, were misunderstood or misinformation passed on with not even 24 hours of talk page being permitted, six weeks is noted as per Wiki Protocols, the following instructions actions must have been misunderstood, despite the above information, which seemed unread or ignored, and talk blocked. I have been assisting the person, and travelled both nationally and internationally at their side. Sometimes helping with specific information relay (computer graphics or film footage during presentations). It is important to note that things are known to both of us as individuals; working so closely together. So as we've worked eons together almost all over the globe, we gather shared data. If 'I' Mum Bot (as I'm like a mother to them in some physical typing or reading things), but the term annoys them.. I set up an identity AS DIRECTED, that was by request and also a non breach of security access, as the other legitimate access and talk was blocked, when no security was blocked. This notified once again to editors as per wiki protocol, but upon our return, we were both horrified at what could be perceived as acts of hyper overreaction, whilst following instructions. ANYONE wanting to partake of malicious actions would not have put a written explanation as per wiki guidance (noted above). Then when an identity for me was created by me, as per criticisms. I too was not treated fairly, justly or humanely; neither of us, just double blocked editing and talk blocked without understanding the above processes. Mum Bot (talk) 09:59, 5 June 2016 (UTC) Mum Bot (talk) 09:59, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 * AS all of the above was not clearly considered before, I Mum Bot appeal and more details follow:
 * Please understand our situation and permit proper talk access and edit access.. PC, Laptop, Tablet and SmartPhone, which we share as I as their Personal Assistant and Guardian, share these technologies, just like Prof. Hawking!
 * Your spelling / grammar suggests a curious business model. Muffled Pocketed  10:07, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

VERY IMPORTANT.
PLEASE read and take note of all, before jumping to conclusions, please:

I am not the user Some1asks, who I read was criticised for (under wiki protocol) allowing a Permitted Care Worker (Employed Personal Assistant), to, "as was said" use the account, IDENTIFYING AND SAYING CLEARLY THEY WERE using the account on behalf of their needing assistance employer, and as per notes provided at the time, as as per Wiki Protocol, the assistant as identified as writing on their behalf, as guided, and no security was breached, 'as someone else noted clearly'. Some1asks even cited National and International law, preventing disability discrimination under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Disabled Persons; Enshrined under Treaty Obligation into National laws (some 20 years old, some 8 years old), plus laws under treaty obligations of continents and enshrined in their national laws.. I the employed PA set up my own personal account, AS CRITICS WANTED, despite wiki permissions giving declarations (as was done). BUT Having directly followed these 'senior editors' requests, some described troll like behaviour continuing. Following direct Wiki and Senior Editors instructions, were misunderstood or misinformation passed on with not even 24 hours of talk page being permitted, six weeks is noted as per Wiki Protocols, the following instructions actions must have been misunderstood, despite the above information, which seemed unread or ignored, and talk blocked. I have been assisting the person, and travelled both nationally and internationally at their side. Sometimes helping with specific information relay (computer graphics or film footage during presentations). It is important to note that things are known to both of us as individuals; working so closely together. So as we've worked eons together almost all over the globe, we gather shared data. If 'I' Mum Bot (as I'm like a mother to them in some physical typing or reading things), but the term annoys them.. I set up an identity AS DIRECTED, that was by request and also a non breach of security access, as the other legitimate access and talk was blocked, when no security was blocked. This notified once again to editors as per wiki protocol, but upon our return, we were both horrified at what could be perceived as acts of hyper overreaction, whilst following instructions. ANYONE wanting to partake of malicious actions would not have put a written explanation as per wiki guidance (noted above). Then when an identity for me was created by me, as per criticisms. I too was not treated fairly, justly or humanely; neither of us, just double blocked editing and talk blocked without understanding the above processes. Mum Bot (talk) 10:06, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 * AS all of the above was not clearly considered before, I Mum Bot appeal and more details follow:
 * Please understand our situation and permit proper talk access and edit access.. PC, Laptop, Tablet and SmartPhone, which we share as I as their Personal Assistant and Guardian, share these technologies, just like Prof. Hawking!

Mum Bot (talk) 10:06, 5 June 2016 (UTC)