User talk:Mumbo-jumbophobe

Talk: Spanish Army
Prease see Talk:Spanish_Army for a continued discussion of the number Billion and its usage.--TGC55 (talk) 07:48, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

==Speedy deletion nomination of Mohammedanism is incompatible with the Enlightenment. For that reason alone Islam is fated to become the favourite cult of the canaille.==

A tag has been placed on Mohammedanism is incompatible with the Enlightenment. For that reason alone Islam is fated to become the favourite cult of the canaille. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Island Monkey talk the talk 18:25, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

May 2012
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Counterjihad. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. –  Richard  BB  10:44, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Jihad Watch
" Kundnani provides no evidence for his assessment specifically regarding Jihad Watch." - this statement is unsourced and appears to be your own opinion - see WP:NOR. As for the other deletions, take them to WP:RSN if you don't think they are reliable sources. Don't just delete them because they don't meet with your pov. Dougweller (talk) 21:51, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Comment
Please familiarize yourself with WP:netiquette
 * 1) do not edit another users edit on a talk page as you did here.

--Wuerzele (talk) 03:23, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) do not use capitalized letters, which is a form of screaming per [[WP:MOS]
 * 2) sign your edits

Alert
Huldra (talk) 20:16, 28 August 2018 (UTC)