User talk:Munch606

Proposed deletion of Finger Circle Punch Game
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Finger Circle Punch Game, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Wikipedia is not for games made up in one day

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. kelapstick (talk) 19:03, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Finger Circle Punch Game
I have nominated Finger Circle Punch Game, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Finger Circle Punch Game. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. kelapstick (talk) 17:43, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Reliable sources
Hi, I am here to explain to you what I mean by reliable sources being used to establish notability. The sources that you have given are:
 * From the Wikipedia guideline for notability which can be found here → Notability
 * If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article.
 * From the Wikipedia guideline for reliable sources which can be found here → Reliable sources:
 * Articles should be based on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy.
 * 1) http://www.instructables.com/id/finger_circle_game/
 * 2) http://www.instructables.com/id/SUHHSRPFLA1LOM9/
 * 3) http://www.webwombat.com.au/entertainment/movies/love-guru.htm
 * 4) http://www.apptism.com/apps/circle-game
 * 5) http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=The%20Circle%20Game
 * 6) http://www.kempa.com/2004/03/08/the-unrelated-thoughts-of-monday/
 * 7) http://www.circlegameapp.com/
 * 8) http://www.circlegame.org/
 * 9) http://www.fox.com/malcolm/journal/206.htm

The reason these sources are not considered reliable are:
 * 1) Instructables is a user created website, and therefore cane be edited by anyone.  There is no fact checking oversight and is therefore not considered reliable.
 * 2) Same as 1
 * 3) The review is not about the game, it is about the movie, simply saying the name of the game in an article does not qualify it as a source to establish notability of the game.
 * 4) An advertisement for a product can not be used as a source
 * 5) Urban dictionary is user created same as # 1
 * 6) Kempa.com is a blog and can not be used to establish notability
 * 7) see # 4
 * 8) Somebodies personal website is not a reliable source for the same reason as #1 and can not be used to establish notability
 * 9) A journal for a fictitious person is not a reliable source.

Once again I am going to leave you two links that you should read. They are the reliable source guideline and the notability guidelines. Please read them before commenting on the deletion discussion again.--kelapstick (talk) 21:30, 13 February 2009 (UTC)