User talk:Muneer2908

May 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Cirt (talk) 17:58, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

August 2011
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Garha. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. noq (talk) 14:51, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Garha. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. noq (talk) 15:09, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

I have cited a source of the information. Please note that a lot of information mentioned by other people earlier in this page has also been posted without any verification.
 * Blogs are not generally considered reliable sources - especially ones where the only entry was created three hours ago immediately after the last warning. Writing your own opinions somewhere else and then using that as a source is not allowed. Please see WP:reliable sources. noq (talk) 18:18, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Ok. That is fine. But what about the information provided by the other users. They have cited a source which does not contain any information to support their version of history. That information should also be tagged as being unverified or something like that.

See, for example, the reference num 3 states: ^ Hindustani Musalmans and Musalmans of the Eastern Punjab Bourne, W. F. G page 40. There is no link, no reference to any source we could verify the sanity of the events described on this page. They have just given the reference of a book which might not necessarily contains all the information put here in this section.

Anywayz, now i have put a very reliable link. I hope you could remove the disputed tag now.
 * As the link does not address the issues, and I am failing to see anything relevant to the article in it. No, I don't think I can. noq (talk) 19:31, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Garha
I have removed the unsourced section at Garha relating to disputed origins. Subsequently I noted that you were a major contributor to that section and that you have been in dispute with at least one other editor who has been pressing you for sources and to stop your original research etc. These past disputes are recent and prolonged. So, this is a pre-emptive warning that if you once again insert that section without any reliable sources to support your statements then I will consider it to be edit warring and take action accordingly.

You are welcome to add material to Wikipedia articles but it must satisfy the project's basic criteria of being verifiable using reliable sources. If you have any issues regarding your understanding of this then please could you take advantage of the article's talk page to discuss it rather than blindly add to the article itself. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 11:41, 8 September 2011 (UTC)