User talk:Muniangallammanask

September 2023
Hello, I'm AntiDionysius. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. AntiDionysius (talk) 13:12, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Belford University, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 16:51, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Belford University, you may be blocked from editing. Attempting to whitewash this organization's reputation by removing relevant citations will just get you blocked. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:48, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

October 2023
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Belford University. —C.Fred (talk) 12:01, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism, as you did at Belford_University. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 12:19, 3 October 2023 (UTC)