User talk:Municat

March 2017
There have been two problems identified with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   15:15, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Your account has been renamed to as requested, but I will leave the block review to another admin. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 17:02, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Do you understand what WP:Conflict of interest is? We appreciate your wish to update information about your company, but do you understand that WP:Neutrality is one of the pillars of Wikipedia and that you should not be directly editing about your company? Do you know that you have to declare WP:paid editing and WP:Conflict of interest? Tell us what kind of edits you intend to make if unblocked?  Vanjagenije  (talk)  14:43, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

I'm aware that Wikipedia relies on neutral information and I do not intend to use it for advertising. However, the information about Ghostery (both the product and the company) is outdated and confusing for readers as much has changed with the new ownership. For instance, the business model as it is currently described refers to the former owner, Evidon, Inc. Municat (talk) 14:59, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Your answer does not say anything about your understanding of the WP:COI. From your answer, I draw conclusion that you intend to continue editing about your company when unblocked. We cannot unblock you if your intention is to make WP:COI edits.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  17:29, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Yes, I intent to edit about my company, because apparently nobody else does. What we actually have here is a confilct with reality. Large parts of the article are misleading and outdated, as with neww ownership mjch has changed dramtically. That can't be in the interest of Wikipedia readers. I would be more than happy if anybody else does the changes, though.