User talk:Municipal.asset.management

Welcome!

Hello, Municipal.asset.management, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Public asset management, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 08:38, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Your contributed article, Public asset management


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Public asset management. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Enterprise asset management. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Enterprise asset management - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 08:38, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Lead too large
You're making the lead section far too large in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints‎. You need to move more of that information into the following paragraphs. -- Avanu (talk) 06:34, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Walkerton Tragedy
I've reverted your adition of the link to Microbial Corrosion from Iron Pipes in the Walkerton Tragedy article here. It appears that you were suggesting that the initial contamination was the result of microbial corrosion in iron pipes, rather than from E. coli contaminated runoff, as was found in the rteports of the incident. Even if that wasn't your intention, there's no need for that link since there is no mention of microbial corrosion inthe article. Meters (talk) 19:56, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

The rest of the story is that even with all of the flushing the old iron pipes because of the microbial corrosion/turberculation )internal corrosion) could not be cleaned enough and all of the pipes were replaced with PVC pipes that do not have the same problems. The run off can start something, but the pipe material, condition and age add and/or continues the problem. This is a growing concern in the water treatment industry as prices rise to chemically treat the issue and the water quality degrades.


 * That's interesting, and may well warrant inclusion in the article, but not the way you did it. Your addition appears to claim that the contamination referred to was the microbial; corrosion, not the runoff. Write a summary of the pipe replacement aftermath, and provide a proper source for the replacement. Details of the general problem would go in the pipe article, not the Walkerton article. Please don't use inline references the way you have been doing in the articles you have been editing if they don't already use them. I suggest you read WP:CITE I was just about to revert or rewrite most of what you put in the pipe article, but I'll leave it for you to look at the references first. Another problem in that article, the decrease in wall thickness of 415% is impossible (it has to be referenced to the original thickness, not the final thickness). It is actually a decrease of 76%. Also, you can't refer to Wikipedia articles as sources. Contact em if you have questions or if I can help. Meters (talk) 20:35, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Map-centric


The article Map-centric has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced dicdef

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  DGG ( talk ) 22:17, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Public asset management for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Public asset management is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Public asset management until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 22:22, 16 February 2013 (UTC)