User talk:Murdoch victim Madam X

July 2014
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Rupert Murdoch. Thank you. Meters (talk) 02:55, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 03:15, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

the editing I did to the Rupert Murdoch Wikipedia content was based on my own first person experiences with him, as he did criminal wrongs to me and then arranged to have my fundamental constitutional rights from me. He owes me the thirty million in damages I am seeking from him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Murdoch victim Madam X (talk • contribs) 03:22, July 28, 2014‎ Moved from talk page by Meters
 * You don't get to try your case on Wikipedia. Unsourced, contentious material about living people is subject to immediate removal per WP:BLPREMOVE. You should read WP:BLP. Meters (talk) 03:34, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Rupert Murdoch
Just to follow up on what the editor above said, we can't have these kinds of things present. Granted, your situation may very well be valid (personally I can believe every word, all things considered), but Wikipedia articles aren't a forum for personal accounts - that's what other types of social media are for, such as BlogSpot or Facebook. However, if you can make your entries with a link with a factual reference, you're welcome to do so. But a personal account without a reference link doesn't help the situation. We don't want to see you get blocked. Johnsmith2116 (talk) 03:39, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it has become apparent that it is being used only for vandalism. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block - read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text at the end of your user talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 05:58, 28 July 2014 (UTC)