User talk:Muri1994

October 2012
Hello, I'm 76.248.149.47. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 76.248.149.47 (talk) 04:26, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. 76.248.149.47 (talk) 04:29, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * You do know that a discussion is usually required before even attempting to delete sourced material? 76.248.149.47 (talk) 04:29, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Baba Deep Singh
Hi, both versions of the martyrdom have been published--saying one of them is wrong is not itself valid reason for continuing to delete one of the versions. Continuing to do so may be seen as disruptive. Please use the article talk page to gain consensus before deleting the text again. Thank you, 76.248.149.47 (talk) 12:34, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Sikh-history. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Baba Deep Singh, but you didn't provide a reliable source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. S H 19:09, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Baba Deep Singh shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. S H 19:09, 3 October 2012 (UTC)