User talk:MurielMary/2018 Archive

Kate Sheppard
Hi Mary! I see there are currently discussions on improving Kate Sheppard up to FA class. It's now rated B Class. If you are interested, you should perhaps liaise with and. The first objective will of course be to bring the article up to GA. That process should give some indication of what more needs to be done. Maybe could also lend a helping hand.--Ipigott (talk) 12:34, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know, I will check this out! MurielMary (talk) 10:10, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

On ITN
Just a little thing, I noticed you moved Dave Holland's entry to the 16th. I think normally entries are posted on the date of announcement if there's more than a three (ish) day difference between the announcement and the actual death. The 16th was already the second-to-last day when his death was announced, and it didn't give time for discussion. -A la d insane (Channel 2)  04:35, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gladys (given name), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gladys Davis, Gladys Taylor and Gladys Foster ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Gladys_%28given_name%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Gladys_%28given_name%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Add pageant winners to notability guidelines?
Hello, I saw that you were a part of Women in Red and I hope you don't mind me asking a question. I believe that pageant winners are notable people, but unlike sports players I feel they're often considered "not important" enough, even though pageants are extremely important to a large part of the population, including mostly women. I was wondering if you knew of a way to get pageant winners added to Wikipedia's official notability guidelines? That way you don't end up with situations like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Cherise_Haugen

In any case, I appreciate all the work you do, and I understand you must be very busy and may not have time to respond. Have a great day :) Lonehexagon (talk) 18:41, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for raising this. I think we could have more discussion in the Women in Red talk page, I'll copy your question over there later on. MurielMary (talk) 19:39, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

SS
The SS was a paramilitary organization under Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party. --2604:2000:E016:A700:808C:6A9F:EC4:AA69 (talk) 08:41, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Schutzstaffel if it helps.  Schwede 66  17:16, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Teitiria Utimawa


The article Teitiria Utimawa has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable badminton player, did not compete in Glasgow 2014."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 18:00, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tinabora Tekeiaki


The article Tinabora Tekeiaki has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable badminton player, did not compete in Glasgow 2014."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 18:00, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Teitiria Utimawa for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Teitiria Utimawa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Teitiria Utimawa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 13:19, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Brenda Heather-Latu


The article Brenda Heather-Latu has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Kleuske (talk) 09:47, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
 * , you prodded the article the very minute it appeared in mainspace. I don't know whether you have read New pages patrol (NPP) but in case you haven't, it says near the top: "Care should be exercised when reviewing very new pages. Tagging anything other than attack pages, copyvios, vandalism or complete nonsense only a few minutes after creation may stop the creation of a good faith article and drive away a new contributor."
 * You can only comply with that if you look at the article history before doing anything. Had you looked at that, you would have seen that the article had been created that very minute. Advice elsewhere on the new pages patrol page suggests that you should wait 10 or 15 minutes since the last edit before you do anything. Please bear that in mind for future NPP.  Schwede 66  18:58, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I applied PRODBLP as is required by policy (WP:BLP), since the article did not contain any sources and it's a biography of a living person. That's followed by a seven day grace period in which sources can be added and the template removed. PSince I'm not a New Page Patroller, the blurb above does not apply. As an encore,, I you wish to berate me about my work here, I'd much prefer you do that on my talk page. Thanks. Kleuske (talk) 19:15, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Besides.... Since the originator of the article is active since 2015, they can reasonably be expected to be familiar with the basics of WP:V and WP:BLP. Kleuske (talk) 19:28, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
 * As per 's request, continuing this discussion on his/her talk page. MurielMary (talk) 23:49, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
 * It isn't a discussion. I complied with policy. End of story. Kleuske (talk) 07:36, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Contesting PRODs
Please see this - I can't believe I'm going to have to AFD all these articles now because your fundamental misunderstanding. What a waste of everyone's time and effort...! GiantSnowman 10:54, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Suji Park


The article Suji Park has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:ARTIST notability criteria"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...  CJ [a Kiwi] in    Oz   08:47, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Suji Park for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Suji Park is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Suji Park until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...  CJ [a Kiwi] in    Oz   09:19, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Karen Mahlab
You have created a biography, without almost any biographical informations. What kind of business ? Mining, fashion?Xx236 (talk) 12:00, 18 May 2018 (UTC) Mahlab established Pro Bono Australia - you can't describe a Pro Bono personality using only their own informations.Xx236 (talk) 12:04, 18 May 2018 (UTC) Maybe different but the link is O.K. If you know better, you may divide the page into two.Xx236 (talk) 12:36, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Oxford Food Symposium at the British Library
Thanks for helping develop Claire Ptak. Note that this makes you a virtual participant in this event which is running currently in the boardroom of the British Library. Here's our etherpad -- feel free to say hi. Andrew D. (talk) 12:11, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * thanks for your message of encouragement yesterday!! MassiveEartha (talk) 06:03, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Sheetal Amte
Hey MurielMary, I saw that you're trying to improve this article and you pulled the PROD from it. As it stands, I'm inclined to take this thing to AfD. This is a BLP, and at the moment it's sourced to a press release and a conference bio. I don't think this article is long for the world with references like that. What do you think? If there's more good references out there I won't take it to AfD.  A  Train talk 11:36, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for posting here. I agree that the article as it stands is poorly sourced, but I'm finding some interesting other sources which seem to suggest notability and I'm happy to do some work re-writing it. MurielMary (talk) 11:40, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Okay! I'll hold fire. Let me know if I can help.  A  Train talk 11:49, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Aww thanks A Train! How nice to log on and see that this morning! MurielMary (talk) 00:03, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Audrey Brown-Pereira has been accepted
 Audrey Brown-Pereira, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 16:12, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Audrey_Brown-Pereira help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

DYK for Claire Ptak
– Ianblair23 (talk) 01:14, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Ellie Soutter
quick note re this edit. Speaking of reliable sources, NZHerald have a follow-up story on the suicide, in which they, um, quote Daily Mail/Mailonline. There is this article in The Times though which, sadly, is behind a paywall. Eesn (talk) 11:06, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Andra Samoa


A tag has been placed on Andra Samoa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.spc.int/sdp/70-inspiring-pacific-women/andra-samoa. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk)  13:50, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Teuira Henry
Alex Shih (talk) 00:01, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Precious
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:31, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Wow thank you very much Gerda, I'm very flattered and proud to see your post and message. I love bringing these little-known women into WP and love even more bringing them to the main page. Teuira Henry went from a new article to main page DYK very rapidly, I was amazed! Hope to "see you" around WP again. MurielMary (talk) 11:21, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Nice meeting you! - Did you see that Inge Borkh was greatly improved by Tim riley? He knew where to find the things I would have had to search for, and put in my note-to-self on the talk. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:34, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Bianca Reinert
Hello, MurielMary,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Bianca Reinert should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Bianca Reinert.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Elmidae (talk · contribs) 07:27, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Jennifer McMahon (disambiguation)
Hello, you reverted my edits to this page, but don't seem to have looked at the policy I linked to in my edit summary, MOS:DABPRIMARY, which shows how to format disambiguation pages when the title ends in (disambiguation), such as John Abel (disambiguation). Please see MOS:DABPRIMARY. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 08:19, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Joan Steinbrenner


The article Joan Steinbrenner has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG. Notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. Also WP:NOTMEMORIAL. This page was created upon her death. The wife of a notable person who didn't gain significant coverage to become notable herself does not meet criteria for an article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:45, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Joan Steinbrenner for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joan Steinbrenner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Joan Steinbrenner until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:31, 17 December 2018 (UTC)