User talk:Murphy9977

Joe Torre
Please stop inserting the same paragraph into the Joe Torre article. Per WP:V, unsourced material can be removed on sight and, per WP:BLP, unsourced criticism of a living person is even less acceptable. —Wknight94 (talk) 13:27, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

No response to my comment but you continue to add the irrelevant nonsense to Joe Torre? You really need to stop. —Wknight94 (talk) 01:23, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Stop it with comments like this. Did you read the message right above this here?  I already left a note at Talk:Joe Torre and you've thusfar ignored it.  You're running out of chances.  —Wknight94 (talk) 19:07, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

June 2008
Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Onorem♠Dil 05:05, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Short block
in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. I have enacted a 31 hour block for both your persistent inappropriate editing of the Joe Torre article, and your response to the efforts of another editor in attempting to discuss your edits. I would comment that should you resume the same edits - and display the same attitude - when you resume editing the next block will likely be of far greater duration. LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:24, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

I have been putting up factual information that others in the discussion board have agreed with in addition to the NY Times, NY Post and array of other sports publication on Joe T. I can't understand why you havve blocked me for stating factual information and allowing these people to edit the truth. This is totally unacceptable and I would like to appeal/
 * To appeal a block you should type in on this talkpage, replacing "state your reason here" with your own comments, and an uninvolved admin will review it. Only by using the template will the admins be alerted. LessHeard vanU (talk) 13:21, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

The post you're insisting on is inflammatory and irresponsible. You're trying to hint at a link between Torre and the Mitchell Report on Torre's article when - as I said on the talk page there - the Mitchell Report makes no negative reference whatsoever to Torre. Using your logic, you could just as easily link the Mitchell Report to George Steinbrenner or Brian Cashman or even Don Zimmer for that matter. They all served in a non-playing quasi-supervisory capacity for the Yankees during that same time frame. You clearly have some bias against Torre specifically. —Wknight94 (talk) 13:50, 26 June 2008 (UTC)