User talk:Murphy Richards

Welcome!
Hello, Murphy Richards, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Murphy Richards, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Mdann52 (talk) 12:51, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Murphy Richards


A tag has been placed on Murphy Richards, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mdann52 (talk) 12:51, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Richard Murphy
I have undone all of your edits to the Richard Murphy (accountant) article, for the reason given in my edit note. Your edits appear to be biased towards a negative view point, and your account name here raises further concerns on your motives. If you think I have made an error, feel free to explain why. Danrok (talk) 18:18, 3 April 2013(UTC)

Murphy Richards (talk) 10:43, 5 April 2013 (UTC) I'm not sure if this is the correct way to talk so apologies if I'm doing something wrong. I have reinstated the changes I have made. The amendments are not biased as they are all factually correct. For example, it is not appropriate to describe him as a director because LLPs do not have directors. Please do feel free to amend and remove any bias you see, but the old article is definitely incorrect. Murphy Richards (talk) 10:43, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

April 2013
Hello, I'm Danrok. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Richard Murphy (accountant), but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Danrok (talk) 11:15, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

All the individual edits have citations to reliable sources. I had to undo the reversion because the article was factually incorrect. Murphy Richards (talk) 11:27, 5 April 2013 (UTC) — Murphy Richards (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.