User talk:Musabaghirovv

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ekvita (February 17)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ekvita and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ekvita, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ekvita Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Curb_Safe_Charmer&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ekvita reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 10:57, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Ekvita


A tag has been placed on Draft:Ekvita, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 10:57, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ekvita (February 17)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ekvita Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:36, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. —Cryptic 12:59, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

This appears to be a case of WP:IDHT. Which part of "You will not be unblocked to continue promoting your organisation" did you find confusing? --Yamla (talk) 13:25, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
 * What I found so offensive about this user's editing was the protests on Draft talk:Ekvita that the article wasn't promotional - which is, of course, ok, but not when followed up by removing all doubt with edits like this. Also saw, after the fact, that EranBot thinks it was a copyvio. —Cryptic 13:29, 17 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Yes i can but i'm trying to full fill all the requirements like referencing and other proofs to get approved by you, i mean one of specialist tried to do the wiki page but they didn't have enough experience for wiki pages but i have helped my several friends for creating wiki pages but they were personal pages, this was the first page that i was trying and now also trying to creat. Mr I appreciate you and you patience but i need a guide to open this wiki page for our company. Musabaghirovv (talk) 13:34, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

As you are refusing to listen to what you've been told and have clearly expressed you have no intention of adhering to WP:COI and WP:PROMO, I have revoked your talk page access. Another admin will be along shortly to review your unblock request. If your current request is declined and if you are interested in writing about subject areas for which you have no conflict of interest, WP:UTRS will be available to you. I'll warn you, if you waste their time like you've been wasting our time, you'll lose that option, too. --Yamla (talk) 13:37, 17 February 2020 (UTC)