User talk:MuseeDesReves/sandbox/outline

Final Project Outline Review (Part 1)
Hi Meghan! I'm going to do my best to address each of these questions for you! I'm sure things will morph and change as the time goes on.

As far as suggestions I would say to capitalize the letter in the first sentence of the introduction. A very minor thing! Although a content related item, I would recommend bolding things such as “a. Jainism:” or “b. Origination:”. I think it will make for an easier read for people. Or you can make each of these into their own subsections; that’s also an option.

Do you plan on having any images of the shrines? I think those types of visual references would be a good addition since not everyone knows about these objects or what they may look like. If they fit within Wikipedia image rules I say go for it! Also, when you mention the term gold leaf, this may be a good wiki resource to point too, Gold Leaf.

Overall, I think your article follows Wikipedia guidelines. You have a variety of resources that are great, and even touch on the topic of cultural considerations, which I think is important to inform people of. One thing that you may address later is having more paragraph content format. However, I know this is just the outline so this may be to early of a statement. Ameenabossier (talk) 23:45, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Review of Final Project Outline

Meghan,

I am very impressed with your outline - It is incredibly thorough and well-organized. I think you cover every area and the majority of our six core aspects. The structure will also make it easily understandable for readers as you begin with an overview of the religions which is a good setup for the rest of the article. You also include potential deterioration which leads well into preventive conservation and then restoration. I also think your section on "cultural considerations" will be an exceptional way to conclude by reconciling the cultural issues with museum specifications. I am positive your outline follows Wikipedia guidelines as it is very comprehensive and well-developed. My only suggestion may be to add a section on resources for the reader - just a few links to further enhance the educational aspect of your article. Otherwise, you have great sources and references. I cannot find any you are missing - I might recommend the CCI's page on sacred objects, because it has a good many resources at the end (not specific to what you are covering, just more general). Overall, you have done a wonderful job on your outline, and I am very interested to read the final article!

Mbleech (talk) 00:00, 1 April 2018 (UTC)