User talk:Museent

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because your username, Museent, does not meet our username policy. '''Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).''' A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account. You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:
 * Adding on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
 * At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
 * Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.


 * A username change will not absolve you of a WP:Conflict of interest . What articles do you plan on editing should you be unblocked? — Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 00:16, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

I was asked by a supervisor to edit the Bomb Girls webpage prior to the premiere of the show, as the page had faulty information regarding the production credits. This was my first ever wikipedia edit. i realize that i have not read all the pages wikipedia has regarding editorial policies. the flowery narrative of my first edit was supplied by my supervisor. when this edit was reversed by an admin, i read the policy the admin supplied as his reversal reason, then neutralized the tone in a re-attempt of the edit. i will refrain from edits the can be construed as narrative and promotional, like the material i was supplied with in my first attempt. i have already advised my supervisor of this wikipedia policy. i do not intend to be a frequent or heavy editor. any subsequent edits would be solely to correct false information in an article for which my employers have supplied me with a correct version. my main purpose in editing a page would also be for link correction. an example of which is the production website external link for the north american tv series Being Human, which i corrected as a guest yesterday. i felt this correction could not wait for my account to be unblocked, as it is resulting in many browsers arriving to a non-existent page on our site. other examples of pages i would like to correct for bad links are: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impact_(TV_miniseries) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pillars_of_the_Earth_(TV_miniseries) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tales_from_the_Neverending_Story http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muse_Entertainment_Enterprises (the about muse) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Trafficking_(TV_miniseries) Muse Entertainment's website is external maintained. and i find my job at Muse sufficiently fulltime already. i took initiative as the in-house IT person at Muse to assist in optimizing external links pointing to our website. but providing content and context to a wikipedia entry related to a Muse product is not something i have been directed to do, nor will i extend any edits beyond correcting false information and bad links. sincerely, anthony davis.