User talk:MusicAndArtFan

Your submission at Articles for creation: 19th Annual Latin Grammy Awards (June 4)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:19th Annual Latin Grammy Awards and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:19th Annual Latin Grammy Awards, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:19th_Annual_Latin_Grammy_Awards Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dodger67&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:19th_Annual_Latin_Grammy_Awards reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 20:06, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

This is an awards show which will take place. Should we just wait until the nominations come out? They will be out in September I believe but I do not have an exact date. I can see if I can find a date for that if that will help. Keep me in the loop.

Regards,

--MusicAndArtFan (talk) 22:25, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Category:Latin Grammy Award venues has been nominated for discussion
Category:Latin Grammy Award venues, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Toohool (talk) 01:49, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Camping World Stadium, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:18, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

September 2018
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Los Angeles Convention Center, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:43, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
I do share this IP address with some other people and I think I was wrongfully blocked. I’m sorry to see that some people don’t have anything better to do other than vandalize Wikipedia articles. This only makes the job of editors more difficult and I certainly know that feeling! --MusicAndArtFan (talk) 20:43, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

--MusicAndArtFan (talk) 22:18, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

There are some teenagers who do share an IP address with me. Maybe I'm assuming wrong, but since they do tend to be pranksters at times, maybe I can have a chat with them and tell them to cut it out. --MusicAndArtFan (talk) 19:52, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

April 2019
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Irving Azoff. Thank you. Jayjg (talk) 20:44, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Everything I put into that section is sourced, including Mr. Azoff's attempts to stop the construction of a competing arena and to give MSG and unfair advantage over AEG. --MusicAndArtFan (talk) 14:06, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The claim that he engages "in what can be interpreted as anti-competitive practices and using tactics to undermine competition" is unsourced. Let the information in the article speak for itself; please don't put your spin on it. Jayjg (talk) 15:06, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 16:01, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 15:38, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 20:39, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MusiCares Person of the Year, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joe Perry ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/MusiCares_Person_of_the_Year check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/MusiCares_Person_of_the_Year?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:25, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Adrian Cosentini
Hello, MusicAndArtFan,

Thank you for creating Adrian Cosentini.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"It isn't at all clear if this guy is notable. one nomination does not satisfy the criteria for awards, and the sources in the article do not demonstrate meeting the WP:GNG."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

—  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) (click me!)    20:55, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Serban Ghenea


A tag has been placed on Serban Ghenea requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Serban Ghenea. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. SmartSE (talk) 12:19, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Serban Ghenea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jewel ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Serban_Ghenea check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Serban_Ghenea?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:31, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Grammy Award records; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ☾Loriendrew☽   ☏(ring-ring)  22:47, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

It's hard to call it an edit war, when I am restoring facts to the article and no only restoring the facts, but presenting proof, from academy sources. As I said, the Grammy winners database has not been updated as of this year's telecast. --MusicAndArtFan (talk) 19:31, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Lana Del Rey. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. KyleJoan talk 14:18, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Adam Ayan moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Adam Ayan, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:05, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Azealia Banks, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. POLITANVM talk 04:34, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

January 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Girth Summit  (blether) 18:38, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Adam Ayan


Hello, MusicAndArtFan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Adam Ayan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:46, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Adrian Cosentini


The article Adrian Cosentini has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, and WP:CREATIVE."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. voorts (talk/contributions) 00:50, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Category:Donor conceived people has been nominated for deletion
Category:Donor conceived people has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 22:12, 28 April 2024 (UTC)