User talk:MusicCrawler

==

Image permission problem with Image:Rat skates 2007.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rat skates 2007.jpg I noticed that that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ==

Soundvisions1 (talk) 02:53, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Re: Rat Skates
Here's an example of how the tone/style of that article is inappropriate for an encyclopaedia: "...where he attended school and was very involved in sports, art and music. He was greatly compelled to music at an early age..." - Okay, 1) Note the word "very" in the first sentence. It's a quantifier. It asserts a POV. Who says he was "very involved"? 2) Who says he was "greatly compelled" to music? - So now that we've worked out that the article has some serious issues, do you want to stop edit warring with Wiki libs please? There are many more problems with the article than that small example above. Read WP:MOS to get a good idea of how an article should be written. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Scarian Call me Pat!  16:10, 12 November 2008 (UTC)