User talk:MusicalGenius2

Source of discussion?
Source of discussion for this comment: Yes but now we are making it so the albums MUST be sourced with an iTunes or Amazon link so we can tell if it is real or fake, please? Because I have seen zero discussion of this at any major project where albums and BLP's for musicians are concerned, especially at Good Article pages. Also, if you're editing logged out of your account that is also unacceptable at Wikipedia, and can lead to potential blocks.  livelikemusic    talk!  13:52, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.  livelikemusic    talk!  12:46, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

April 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at BET Awards 2007, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 13:25, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Kelly Rowland. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Binksternet (talk) 13:33, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

iTunes or Amazon links
are seen as promotional There are WP:reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject that can be used to make sure information is verifiable. Thanks--Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 03:28, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Neicey Dior discography


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Neicey Dior discography requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. &#x2230; Bellezzasolo &#x2721;  Discuss  16:44, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Giving you time to fix this before I honor the CSD tag. Please read WP:Music, the relevant notability guide. Please read User:Dlohcierekim/del, the notice I would give were I actually deleting this. You might want to create articles via the WP:article wizard to help you.--Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 17:00, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Nope. see this edit. ansh 666  19:48, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * That's interesting. At the time of my post here, it was a bare-bones, A1 stub, and I hate to be hasty. On the other hand, I view the link you referenced as blatant vandalism. Don't know why we aren't blocked for vandalism. Just logged in after sleep and dog walk in park. you've intrigued me. Thoughts?--Dloh cier ekim   (talk) 20:47, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

April 2018
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Beyoncé, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ansh 666 19:47, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

May 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. A number of your edits appear to be unconstructive to the point where people are calling them vandalism. It doesn't help that you are not responding to the messages being left on your talk page. In particular the introduction of factually false claims into articles is a serious no no. If you are unsure about an edit, don't make it. There are a lot of experienced editors who will be happy to help you. If this continues you are likely going to end up being blocked. -Ad Orientem (talk) 14:35, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Invasion of Privacy (album), you may be blocked from editing.  Ss  112   19:42, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. 331dot (talk) 11:31, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Your ridiculous accusations
I see you created a report including me at WP:SPI, where you claimed that I'm affiliated with/a sockpuppet of MrWriter245 called "Bardigang". This just looks like sour grapes/vindictive behaviour because you couldn't get your way at Invasion of Privacy (album). I told you to wait for consensus on the talk page to be determined by an uninvolved editor, but instead, you turn around and try to connect me to some Cardi B fan account who edited earlier this month. I don't even like Cardi B that much that I would create an account named after her. In fact, I've never liked any musician enough that I would call myself one of the names given to their fanbase. You have now been blocked for your disruptive edits/insertion of plainly false information, including where you faked certifications for said album. Seems moreso that you are the fan of Cardi B here rather than me. It looks like your accusation at SPI is now going to be dismissed as more disruptive editing by you, but nice try in thinking admins will just blindly block anybody accused of sockpuppetry.  Ss  112   12:07, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Also, you claim that I said I was the user "Bardigang"...where did I say this? Funny how you didn't provide a link to where I apparently claimed this. In my experience, most sockpuppeters don't admit they are somebody else or doing anything wrong.  Ss  112   12:09, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Also, I've just done some digging as to what Bardigang did, and your accusation doesn't even make sense. It appears Bardigang thought "Drip" is a promotional single, whereas I reverted you for downgrading "Drip" due to the discussion over whether it is/isn't not being closed. Also, you edited the archive of MrWriter245's SPI page, so it's been removed by an admin. That's not how you file a new report/accusation.  Ss  112   12:22, 26 May 2018 (UTC)