User talk:Musicale 89

February 2017
Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you made a change to an article, What's on Your Mind (Pure Energy), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sum mer PhD v2.0 02:20, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Redirected pages
I redirected some of your articles with a clear edit summary. Please read Notability and Verifiability. Deb (talk) 18:44, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Fun, Live and Criminal
I already fixed the issues on Fun, Live and Criminal but please see the album style guide for better article formatting: WP:MOSALBUM. Thanks --Jennica ✿ / talk 02:39, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Please use edit summaries to avoid situations like this
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Bittersweet (Fuel song) does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 14:38, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Flicker (album), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Hayman30 (talk) 10:21, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Uncovered (Robin Schulz album)
Thank you for creating Uncovered (Robin Schulz album). However, as it is, your article fails WP:NALBUMS. Please do not create articles without any sources, as all information on Wikipedia needs to be verifiable. Thank you.  Ss 112  19:16, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Synesthesia - I Think in Colours, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EDM ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Synesthesia_-_I_Think_in_Colours check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Synesthesia_-_I_Think_in_Colours?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Contact (Boney James album)
Hello, Musicale 89,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Contact (Boney James album) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Contact (Boney James album).

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Elmidae (talk · contribs) 13:54, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Sweet Lui-Louise moved to Draft:Sweet Lui-Louise
Hi, Greetings. Pls note that your creation of Sweet Lui-Louise has been moved to Draft:Sweet Lui-Louise. Content added/edited in Wikipedia needs "inline citation" from independent (third party / secondary / tertiary) reliable source (in any language) for verification to gauge the nobility criteria is met. The articles's inline citation is the WP:BURDEN which it is on the person adding the information. Please note official website, records of sport events or individual player records are consider primary source and not independent source, and social network source such as facebook, twitter, instagram, imbd and etc are considered NOT reliable source and can not be used for citing. Independent reliable source are sources are those obtain from major newspaper, such as The Guardian, Sydney Morning Herald, CNN news and etc. or source obtain from major publisher of the work (for example, Random House or Cambridge University Press). Pls see


 * 1) reliable source - see WP:RS
 * 2) primary vs secondary vs tiartiary source - see WP:WPNOTRS
 * 3) verification - see WP:V
 * 4) notability - see WP:N
 * 5) citing source - see WP:Citing sources and WP:Tutorial/Citing sources
 * 6) citing from internet sourc - see  WP:CITEWEB and its template -see Template: cite web

Once you have provided inline citations, kindly ping me at my talk page or at your talk page by typing (please remove "nowiki" upon replying) for me to review the page. For more editing help, you could send your question to the friendly and helpful volunteers at the Teahouse. Lastly, I strongly encourage you to visit WP:The Wikipedia Adventure for there are some short and fun exercises on neutrality, verifiability, collaboration, research and sourcing. Thank you.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:04, 28 March 2018 (UTC)