User talk:Musicedbloggerman

The Restoring Music Foundation
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Restoring Music Foundation, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.restoringmusic.com/foundation. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:12, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Update regarding copyright concern
Since we do not yet have verification of permission by the processes set out above and sufficient time has passed since the placement of the notice, the article has been deleted for copyright concerns. This deletion is not necessarily permanent. If you have already sent a letter to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) and GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) (if you are not the copyright holder or have co-authored the material, release under CC-BY-SA-compatible license alone is sufficient), the article will be restored when that letter is received and processed by the Wikimedia Communications committee. Likewise, if you have not yet sent a letter, you still may (or resend it, if you believe your original may have been lost), and the article will be restored when that letter is received and processed.

As Wikipedia does not require proof of identity on account creation, it is essential that we receive external proof of authorization in order to ensure that we remain compliant with US Copyright law. It is also essential that we verify that copyright holders understand the extent of the release they are authorizing, in that our licenses permit modification and reuse in any forum, even commercial publication, as long as authorship credit is maintained and future copies are compatibly licensed.

Please note that once permission is verified, the material may be evaluated and altered to meet Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Although we appreciate donations, we cannot guarantee that material donated will be retained.

Thank you. MLauba (talk) 14:16, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

January 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page The Restoring Music Foundation has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 00:15, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Chris Purifoy, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Wine Guy  Talk  04:33, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Restoring Music Foundation


The article The Restoring Music Foundation has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This would appear to be an organization that doesn't pass the relevant notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. B figura (talk) 21:42, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of The Restoring Music Foundation
I have nominated The Restoring Music Foundation, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/The Restoring Music Foundation. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. B figura (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Philip E. Daniels
I have nominated Philip E. Daniels, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Philip E. Daniels. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Wine Guy  Talk  00:09, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Chris Purifoy
I have nominated Chris Purifoy, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Chris Purifoy. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Wine Guy  Talk  01:33, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Musicedbloggerman for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.
 * Based on information provided by User:Cdpurifoy and User:Pea12345, I have withdrawn this SPI. Wine Guy   Talk  06:53, 19 January 2010 (UTC)