User talk:MusicforthePeople/Talk archive/2017

Some reliable music sources

Your GA nomination of The Same Old Blood Rush with a New Touch
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Same Old Blood Rush with a New Touch you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 04:40, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Same Old Blood Rush with a New Touch
The article The Same Old Blood Rush with a New Touch you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Same Old Blood Rush with a New Touch for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 00:40, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Same Old Blood Rush with a New Touch
The article The Same Old Blood Rush with a New Touch you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Same Old Blood Rush with a New Touch for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 01:02, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Classic Albums: Pink Floyd – The Making of The Dark Side of the Moon


The article Classic Albums: Pink Floyd – The Making of The Dark Side of the Moon has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * The article's topic is not notable and its info can be covered on the page "Classic Albums".

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Fayenatic  L ondon 14:06, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Untitled
I Still consider your edit to be redundant and useless. Plenty other artist albums use their official casing even if it 'iz uncoordinatED LIek THEIIZ' I don't see you or anyone else making these edits. Justin Bieber's purpose album for example. Uses the official spelling and casing as on the album. things like song titles and artist names shouldn't be changed "for the sake of english" these are copyrighted things and are the official way they're known. It does NOT come down to personal preference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by XXEmoPunk911Xx (talk • contribs) 02:32, 1 February 2017 (UTC)


 * It's not personal preference, it's following a guideline that has been agreed upon by the community. Also, see MOS:TRADEMARKS: "Follow standard English text formatting and capitalization rules, regardless of the preference of trademark owners." Yeepsi (talk) 09:27, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Purpose does follow the guideline, though. Some of the songs on the deluxe/Walmart editions with "to"/"in"/"the" in them are in lowercase, as per the guideline. Yeepsi (talk) 09:47, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Tell Me I'm Pretty
Can you expand and revamp the article? 183.171.182.246 (talk) 06:15, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't have any interest in the band/that album, sorry. Yeepsi (talk) 10:19, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Just a thought...
...you might like to see this.  danny music editor  Speak up! 00:54, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Congrats on the GA! Yeepsi (talk) 01:02, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Brian McTernan
Hi, saw you removed all the links to McTernan's name...his article was deleted at AfD, but he's a producer on dozens of noteworthy musicians' albums. I had hoped someone would eventually dig up enough information about him to reconstitute that article, but now that all the links were taken down, I doubt anybody will think to look now. If you come across interviews or other coverage of him, I'd be interested, as I'd very much like myself to put that one back up. Chubbles (talk) 21:06, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I'll keep an eye for any interviews I come across. If you do restore the article, I'll gladly go back and re-add the links. Yeepsi (talk) 21:07, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Remember the Laughter
Hello, Yeepsi,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Remember the Laughter should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Remember the Laughter.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

 Onel 5969  TT me 01:43, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Selfish Machines
Ayo. Sent this up for GOCE to work on since I noticed it's got issues with prose, apparently. I noticed that you were the original GA nominator. If you don't intend to finish off this article, do I have your permission to nominate this at a later time? It'd probably be May before I nominate it, but still would like to have this post-hardcore classic up there.  danny music editor  Speak up! 21:10, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Sure Danny, go for it. Yeepsi (talk) 22:35, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I did a bit of clean-up with the extra tags and noticed most of the refs had died. I would gladly add archive links, but the Wayback Machine won't load for me, for some unknown reason. I did manage to replace a few of the dead refs with better sources, though, and added a bunch of new ones to the talk. Yeepsi (talk) 23:29, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
 * You're a citation wizard, Yeepsi.  danny music editor  Speak up! 00:28, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

North (Something Corporate album)
Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article North (Something Corporate album) has been completed.

You'll notice that I archived one of the article’s citations (#1). I suggest you archive the rest of the article’s URLs as time allows. This ensures that the article's references are available "forever" and that it doesn’t develop "dead links" over time. The site I use is https://archive.org/web/. Simply copy the URL in the citation and paste it in the "Save Page Now" box on the archive.org site and click "Save". This creates a copy of the original page and provides you with a new URL to add to the original citation. If you look at the URL I've archived you'll see the syntax. You add the new URL to the end of the original citation like this: |archiveurl=http etc|archivedate=March 12, 2017}}. Not all websites allow archiving, so there's not much you can do about that unless there is an alternate citation you could use.

Good luck with the GAR.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:14, 12 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks so much! Yeepsi (talk) 22:12, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited From the Screen to Your Stereo Part II, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alternative Press. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

The Used discography
Hey Yeepsi, I'm not sure if you care about the band that much, but a user you reverted who's been trying to push through undiscussed changes every now and again on The Used discography since 2015 has been at it again over the past week or so. Would you be able to help keep an eye on the page? They've been moving singles and albums around willy-nilly and making other such unquestionable actions. Thanks!  Ss 112  06:22, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Sure, I'll keep an eye on the article. Yeepsi (talk) 10:37, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Boys Like Girls (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Audition. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TOP Stressed Out.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:TOP Stressed Out.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

New Again
Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article New Again has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 18:41, 20 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the CE! Yeepsi (talk) 18:47, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Taking Back Sunday
Hi: I've just started the c/e you requested and have not been able to resolve this issue in the lead.

In May " Faith (When I Let You Down)" was released as a single, along with its music video. In June, "This Is All Now" was released as a single, and on June 28, Taking Back Sunday was released through Warner Bros. and Sire Records. The band embarked on a tour of the US with Thursday in June and July. In July, a music video was released for " Faith (When I Let You Down)", followed by the release of the single "You Got Me" in August.

Was the music video released in May or August - you have two conflicting dates (underlined). Can you let me know? Thanks. Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:18, 24 April 2017 (UTC)


 * They're two different videos: one showing the recording process, as well as live footage, while the other has a narrative to it. I forgot to mention the difference when expanding the lead, my mistake. Yeepsi (talk) 20:37, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I should have read more carefully further on in the article - sorry. I've clarified the info in the lead. Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:11, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Taking Back Sunday (album)
Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Taking Back Sunday (album) has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 18:14, 25 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the CE! Yeepsi (talk) 18:37, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Beggars Banquet tracks


A tag has been placed on Template:Beggars Banquet tracks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes ( ).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ojorojo (talk) 16:51, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Let It Bleed tracks


A tag has been placed on Template:Let It Bleed tracks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes ( ).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ojorojo (talk) 16:51, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Exile on Main St. tracks


A tag has been placed on Template:Exile on Main St. tracks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes ( ).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ojorojo (talk) 16:51, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Sticky Fingers tracks


A tag has been placed on Template:Sticky Fingers tracks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes ( ).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ojorojo (talk) 16:51, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of New Again
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article New Again you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 04:01, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Taking Back Sunday (album)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Taking Back Sunday (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 04:01, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry I have been a bit slow on these, I saw there was a huge backlog so grabbed a couple hoping it would motivate me to actually review them. Just been a bit busy IRL, reviewing another article now then I will hit yours up. Thanks for your patience!  Kees08  (Talk)   06:06, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
 * It's alright, no rush. Yeepsi (talk) 09:00, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Black Cloud (Pink Floyd song) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Black Cloud (Pink Floyd song). Since you had some involvement with the Black Cloud (Pink Floyd song) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:13, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Nothing Personal (All Time Low album)
Nice work on this! Looks nothing like the page I previously visited. Solid.  danny music editor  Speak up! 15:12, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks Danny! Yeepsi (talk) 15:44, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

What to Do When You Are Dead
Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article What to Do When You Are Dead has been completed.

Good luck with the GAR.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:03, 7 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the CE! Yeepsi (talk) 13:05, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Taking Back Sunday (album)
The article Taking Back Sunday (album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Taking Back Sunday (album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 04:21, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

In case you don't know...
You may have seen the very useful InternetArchiveBot go around archiving stuff. A friend of mine notified me recently that it is now free to use for any user. It's a bot which makes it incredibly easy to archive sources. I can archive five articles' worth of sources (completely) in 45-90 seconds. Check out IAbot! (Forgive me if this sounds like an advertisement, like seriously, you need to use this, your workload on fixing sources will minimize greatly.) I could run some of the GAs we have mutual concern about if you'd like.  danny music editor  Speak up! 02:48, 14 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I'd appreciate if you could run it on the GAs. Yeepsi (talk) 19:40, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Reflist|2
Please note that reflist|2 is deprecated per Template:Reflist. If you don't know the best ways to format these are:


 * for 2 columns (equivalent to reflist|2)
 * for 3 columns (equivalent to reflist|3)
 * for 4 columns (equivalent to reflist|4)

Thanks. --Jennica ✿ / talk 01:50, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

So Wrong
Hey there! Just finished the copyedit on So Wrong, It's Right, and I'd recommend adding some citations in the lead, as there are none, and updating the bonus tracklist. Other than that, not too shabby! ɯ ɐ ɔ 💬 22:31, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Mm! Before I forget -- I'm also working on Nothing Personal for you, too. Gotta love ATL. ɯ ɐ ɔ 💬 22:32, 25 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the CE! According to WP:LEADCITE, citations don't need to be in the lead unless it's some extraordinary claim or a quote. Yeepsi (talk) 22:36, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of New Again
The article New Again you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:New Again for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 21:42, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Personnel formatting
Please format personnel per the WP:MOSALBUM guidelines.

Name – function

Not: Function: Name.

Thanks. --Jennica ✿ / talk 10:08, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I've always done Name – function, though. User:Thedivinemania added Function: Name. Yeepsi (talk) 10:12, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Nothing Personal (All Time Low album)
Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Nothing Personal (All Time Low album) has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:08, 26 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the CE! Yeepsi (talk) 21:09, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Based on a True Story (The Starting Line album)
Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Based on a True Story (The Starting Line album) has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 22:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

So Wrong, It's Right
Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article ''So Wrong, It's Right has been completed.

I marked a sentence in the Composition and Recording section that I think needs clarification. It's an interesting quote, but it needs to be elaborated upon because, as it stands now, it raises questions that aren't answered.

I had a look to see why citation #75 is displaying the way it is, but I couldn't figure out how to get rid of the instructions. Perhaps you know?

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:14, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Exile on Main St. tracks


A tag has been placed on Template:Exile on Main St. tracks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes ( ).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ojorojo (talk) 18:19, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of North (Something Corporate album)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article North (Something Corporate album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tbhotch -- Tbhotch (talk) 18:20, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of North (Something Corporate album)
The article North (Something Corporate album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:North (Something Corporate album) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tbhotch -- Tbhotch (talk) 02:40, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of North (Something Corporate album)
The article North (Something Corporate album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:North (Something Corporate album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tbhotch -- Tbhotch (talk) 23:21, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Full Moon Fever tracks
Template:Full Moon Fever tracks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:30, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nothing Personal (All Time Low album)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nothing Personal (All Time Low album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DannyMusicEditor -- DannyMusicEditor (talk) 13:21, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

"Through Being Cool"
I remember almost two years ago now you attempted to nominate this and had no success. Do you wish for a co-nomination, or would you rather I nominated it like I did with Selfish Machines? I think I have it all fixed up.  danny music editor  Speak up! 23:53, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
 * You can nominate it Danny, all yours a la Selfish Machines. Yeepsi (talk) 00:29, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Man Overboard (Man Overboard album)
Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Man Overboard (Man Overboard album) has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 22:11, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the CE! Yeepsi (talk) 22:25, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Sound the Alarm (Saves the Day album)
Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Sound the Alarm (Saves the Day album) has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with the GAN

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:24, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks again for the CE! Yeepsi (talk) 13:26, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

A Lesson in Romantics
A long time ago, I made some edits to A Lesson in Romantics in the hopes of seeing it one day promoted to "good article" status. I got sidetracked... like, really sidetracked... and then lo-and-behold I notice years later that the album has been promoted! I presented a barnstar to DannyMusicEditor, who told me that you also co-wrote and co-nominated the article, and so I present you with this belated barnstar:


 * Thanks so much! Yeepsi (talk) 17:25, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Halloween cheer!


Happy Halloween!

Hello Yeepsi: Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!   –   danny music editor  Speak up! 01:45, 1 November 2017 (UTC) Send Halloween cheer by adding {{subst:Happy Halloween}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

I should probably clarify I'm in Eastern USA so it's still Halloween here, LOL.

Wikiproject
Thank you for catching that.  danny music editor  Speak up! 16:32, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

GOCE review

 * Thanks for the CE! Yeepsi (talk) 19:15, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Great work once again! A suggestion: Taking Back Sunday's bio is suffering terribly. It seems someone is picking up on this and fixing the article up little by little, but have you ever thought to add some information you're putting in the album articles into the biography itself? Just thought I'd bring this to your attention.  danny music editor  Speak up! 03:05, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks Danny. Funnily enough, I did actually plan on working on their main article after I had expanded their albums (something I've also been meaning to do with ADTR, Mayday, etc). Since I'm more or less done (aside from sending to GOCE) with their newest album, I might get round to their bio later this week or next week. Yeepsi (talk) 14:31, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

WP:NALBUMS
Hi. I just want to suggest that this might not be the last word about how to structure discographical information on Wikipedia. There are a number of editors who unilaterally redirect any album page without a battery of reviews attached to it to an artist page, without merging any content. I have never thought this to be constructive, and there are at least some people who agree with me; there was a recent conversation at WT:MUSIC (here) in which this was debated somewhat further, with little headway. So I guess I just want you to be sure, for yourself, that you're doing the right thing for the project in hewing to the letter of that contested guideline. Chubbles (talk) 05:33, 17 December 2017 (UTC)