User talk:Musiconeologist/Archive 1

See Also sections
In Wikipedia, we don't say, See [other article] for more information. This is the proper way to do it. --  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 14:08, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

September 2021
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Comte AC-4, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 16:39, 13 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Please be assured that I obsessively preview while editing and before saving! I'm not sure what happened here.


 * This was a suggested edit in the Android app, which presents articles with no short description together with a small box for entering one. Unless you open the article itself for editing then save from there, the only change that's possible is the automatic insertion of the short description tag, with whatever text is typed in. What puzzles me is that there's a change outside the tag, which shouldn't be possible. And the edit is tagged, so can't have been done manually in the article.


 * The normal sequence in the app is: enter the description and tap Publish; check the preview which appears; tap Publish again to save the edit.


 * At one point while adding descriptions the app unexpectedly saved the edit (without showing me a preview) and went straight to the next suggested edit (possibly as a result of my accidentally catching the Publish button while trying to put the cursor at the end of the text?). I think it may have been with this article. There was another occasion where I inadvertently missed a preview by double-tapping. But either way, the edit shouldn't have affected anything outside the tag.


 * Anyway this looks to me like a bug in the app. If you've any idea where to report that, it would be very helpful. (I've had a few other problems with it and couldn't find any indication where to report them.) Musiconeologist (talk) 18:46, 13 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks so much for your reply! This is way outside my area of expertise, unfortunately, so I have no idea where to report the issue. I may send an email about it to the general Wikipedia help email, though. I'm unfamiliar with the app, but to me, it looks as if the lack of line break here:


 * {|{{Infobox Aircraft Begin


 * ...is what caused the broken infobox. I've been finding many instances of this error today, and they all display the same way. I have no idea why the formatting would be so sensitive as to crumble because of a missing line break!


 * Anyway, no harm done, and I very much appreciate your input, from one obsessive Previewer to another. :) Jessicapierce (talk) 19:29, 13 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks for that! Now that I'm either remembering more clearly (or constructing a more convincing false memory—who knows?) I think I actually went in to the article to correct something as well as add the description, then wanted to put it on a separate line but had trouble getting the cursor in the right place and suddenly found I was no longer editing . . . I don't know. I need to keep more of an eye on what the app's up to when I use it, I think. Musiconeologist (talk) 19:58, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Fluctuation Spectrum
Hi, I read your comments on the Fluctuation spectrum article. As far as I can tell, "Fluctuation spectrum" is just a less common synonym for the Fourier spectrum. Do you have any objection to my simply blanking the article and redirecting it to Fourier transform? PianoDan (talk) 17:21, 15 December 2021 (UTC)


 * @PianoDan I'm sorry I never replied to this—I'm very happy that you went ahead soon after and redirected it to Spectral density, which seems exactly right.
 * As I remember, I was randomly presented with the article when adding short descriptions, but it was in such a bad state that I couldn't add one without trying to make it comprehensible first. An interesting editing challenge, but maybe one it was unwise to accept . . . Musiconeologist (talk) 14:18, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Red Jay (talk) 20:00, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Computer Peripherals


The article Computer Peripherals has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unnecessary redirect per WP:ONEOTHER"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk)  02:58, 24 March 2024 (UTC)


 * @StreetcarEnjoyer I'm happy for it to be deleted. The only (non-)reason to keep it would be the one incoming link I was unable to edit because it was on a page containing a 17,000-line list. My main concern was that initially, entering computer peripherals in the search box went straight to the company article. Once I'd moved the article to Computer Peripherals (company), I couldn't really keep Computer Peripherals as a redirect to it, so changed that to a disambiguation page. But deletion is a better option. Musiconeologist (talk) 03:24, 24 March 2024 (UTC)