User talk:Musicpvm/Archive 3

Image tagging for Image:Kingofqueens.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kingofqueens.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:42, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/KROQ Top 106.7 Countdowns (2nd nomination)
Hi Musicpvm, I've just closed this AfD as no consensus again. However, this is by no means suggestive of a precedent on radio countdown lists. As this appears to be a systemic issue, I encourage you to proceed with a Request for comment on the issue of countdown lists, if you feel strongly about it. Many thanks -- Samir  धर्म 05:57, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

pls revert
Ethnicity should generally not be emphasized in the opening unless it is relevant to the subject's notability, I would agree. But here I believe that it is relevant to the subject's notability. For example, she is listed on the wikipedia list of jewish blacks. Pls revert. Tx. --Epeefleche 04:22, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually, we have lists for every ethnicity and religion you can think of on Wikipedia. That doesn't mean everyone on those lists should violate MOS in their header. Mad Jack 15:32, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Re: La Toya Jackson
Hi musicpvm. Thanks for the note on my talk page. I really should have put that request on your talk page the same as I asked you to do for me. That way you would have gotten the New Messages box instead of having to find it on your watchlist or stumble across it on the article talk page. Thanks for the reference. Happy editing! --Cromwellt|talk|contribs 18:41, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

i think u need to stop making biased changes on ashanti's page. if ashanti is not hip hop as well as r&b neither is mary.Danotorious1jd 02:55, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

that 's what i was saying she is hip hop soul and r&B but you keep taking it out. so are we seeing eye to eyeDanotorious1jd 03:54, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Pop ballad
Please refer to articles Long Black Veil (song), The Most Beautiful Girl in the World (Prince song), Still Waiting (Prince song), Only You (Harry Connick Jr), Long Black Veil (song), Diamonds and Pearls (song), Do Me, Baby etc.

"Pop ballad" is a genre, like rock ballad. Some R&B/soul/pop musicians experience with this genre (like in Unfaithful (song), Kelly Clarkson is the best modern example) and some focus on this genre (as far as I know Prince is the most famous). Pop ballad is non-danceable pop music, influenced by classical music, and usually having very melodic lyrics. I hope that clears the topic. Psychomelodic 14:12, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:Kingofqueens.jpg
An image that you uploaded, Image:Kingofqueens.jpg, has been listed at Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu Badali 02:25, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Raja Yoga controversy
Dear Hinduism Project editors,

There is a controversy on the Hinduism regarding Raja Yoga. Please read the debate on the Hinduism discussion page. Your comments are requested on the Hinduism discussion page to help resolve the controversy. Thank you. 68.239.78.172 15:05, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Jyotiraditya Madhavrao Scindia
Since you made input on the CfD for Category:Hindu politicians, I would request you to take a look at the cat and the talk page listed above for a controversy.Bakaman Bakatalk 01:55, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

An award
P.S. Please feel free to move the award to your user page, I didn't know where to put it on your page (which is full of userbox), so I put it here, on your talk page. :) utcursch | talk 10:04, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Page move
Since you participated in the last survey, just a couple months ago, you may be interested to know there is yet another proposal to move Los Angeles, California. Jonathunder 05:17, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Re: Stop removing genres from articles
I don't know what makes you think Beyoncé is a pop musician. Just because she has some danceable songs? Hopefully, there are still non-poppish contemporary R&B singers, and Beyoncé is definitely one of these. No way "Naughty Girl" and "Check On It" are pop songs. Who cares if "Check On It" did well on Billboard Pop 100? Amerie's "1 Thing" and Alicia Keys' "Unbreakable" also charted the Pop 100, and they aren't pop songs. Also, Beyoncé's music sounds totally different from actual pop-R&B singers' one (Ashanti, Mariah Carey, Jennifer Lopez et al.). By the way, she has more soul-oriented songs than pop ones, just listen to Dangerously In Love. Unfortunately, B'Day didn't do the same... All I'm trying to say is, I didn't mean to be annoying or something, I just can't stand this whole pop thing. That's it. Funk Junkie 20:17, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Thief
Just wanted to let you know I reverted your change of the "Thief" article for Our Lady Peace. Unbeknownst to many there is no naming convention that favors the band name over the song release year in the title. There is no reason to change this.&mdash; OLP 1999 22:44, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Pink
Thanks for the information about the Pink move. I have now gone through the requested move steps and the discussion appears at Talk:P%21nk. I hope I got it right. Wryspy 21:08, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Template:Evanescence
Out of curiosity, why did you remove the includeonly for Category:Evanescence from this page? -- Huntster  T • @ • C 02:58, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Understood. I knew the function of course, but I supposed that it would be useful to have all of those in the Evanescence category, and then further break down into the albums and songs subcats.  Ah well, I'll keep it in mind for the future.  --  Huntster  T • @ • C 14:45, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi!
Hi, will you help me get Donna Summer to WP:GA status. SunStar Net 12:39, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for being calm
Wanted to express appreciation for some of the more mellow corrections made on the Talk:Beyoncé Knowles page. (People there sure get heated ... the lengthy debate on what notes she can or can't hit is just mind-blowing for me.) I especially liked the polite explanation to the person who thought a lot of material had been deleted, where you explained about using the page history. I had just read suggestions about that at Don't bite the newcomers. Best wishes to you, and keep cool. Lawikitejana 21:52, 1 November 2006 (UTC) a fellow Heroes viewer, BTW

Category:Categories named after television series
I wonder, when you added Category:Categories named after television series to the TV serise categories, why did you delete the existing categories without checking if the main articles depended on those existing categories for categorization? For example, America's Got Talent relied on Category:America's Got Talent to be included in Category:2000s TV shows in the United States, Category:NBC network shows, etc. Reading Categorization and subcategories, I realize this dependence is wrong. But it would have been nice if such a dependency in the main articles was fixed first. Tinlinkin 08:27, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Indian Americans, Sexual Predators
Not enough reason to justify that RV. Talk:Indian_American Would like to know what you think. Did you even read the sources or watch the video in MSNBC? --பராசக்தி 20:11, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Harry Potter
RHB(AWB) 23:15, 30 December 2006 (UTC), on behalf of WPHarry Potter

hi
As you were a participant in this discussion you may want to see the new avatar of the discussion. Baka man  16:09, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Talk:The Real World: San Francisco
Hi. It seems we have a possible edit war on the The Real World: San Francisco article. If you could respond to the post I made on its talk page, it would be appreciated. Nightscream Nightscream 04:56, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Beyoncé Knowles
Do you have any other sources other then the ones you are using? The current ones use a video that does not have a clear identity of the person being filmed. You claimed that "received much attention in mainstream media". You should provide better sourcing. One last thing. This section has no relevance to the main article and should be moved to the Peta article. Purgatory Fubar Converse or Snafu 20:23, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Help?
Can you check the LeToya Luckett page again? We've got a user there who insists that his edits are wonderful when in fact they aren't (just read them, ugh). I manually went thru the article and cleaned it up this morning but this person just reverts me and I've already reverted it twice and I'm not about to violate 3RR for something so stupid. More background on my Talk Page, if you want further reading. I need a new pair of eyes on this and this editor is convinced I'm a "vandal". Take a look? Thanks in advance. - eo 20:50, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Bloomfield Township, Michigan
Deleted. I assume you are moving the DAB back there?--Isotope23 20:44, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Billboard template
Thank you so much for making a template for the Billboard charts. I look at these pages regularly and I have wondered why someone had not made one already. It is fantastic, and although I live in Australia, I read the charts every week and now the Wikipedia page for them has been made better by your great template. Thanks again! User:Ss112 23:27, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Powderfinger Edits
G 1  ggy  Talk/Contribs 00:14, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Hi
Hi - I would appreciate it if you could please respond to the message on my discussion page. Thanks. Jester7777

Spells in Harry potter
It is currently under a deletion review. Therequiembellishere 17:14, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Harry Potter roll-call
Hi there. Your username is listed on the WikiProject Harry Potter participants list, but we are unsure as to which editors are still active on the project. Your name has therefore been moved to a "potentially inactive" list. If you still consider yourself an active WikiProject Harry Potter editor, please move your name from the Potentially inactive list to the Active Contributors list. You may also wish to add  to your userpage, if you haven't done so already. Conversely, if you do not wish to be considered a member of the WikiProject, leave your name where it is and it will be moved to the Inactive Contributors section. If you wish to make a clean break with the Project you may move your name to the Known to have left section. Many thanks.