User talk:Musikci

Hangon

Speedy deletion of James sclater
A tag has been placed on James sclater requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 23:44, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Regarding hangon templates
Hello. The template hangon is to be placed on the article tagged for deletion. Unfortunately, in this case the article has already been deleted. Please read over WP:BIO to get an idea of the notability guidelines for articles on people. If you feel that the article as written asserted encyclopedic notability as it was, you may wish to address it with the deleting administrator, User:Alexf. Articles deleted out of process can also be addressed through deletion review. Alternatively, if the article did not assert the significance of the subject, you may wish to create the article again with an assertion of significance. In order to avoid other deletion processes, please be sure to verify your assertions with reliable sourcing. Thanks, and if you have any questions about this, please let me know at my talk page. You can also seek assistance at Wikipedia help desk, which is typically manned around the clock by volunteers. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:49, 6 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I took a look at the deleted contents, and while this individual seems potentially notable enough, I'm afraid a graver concern is that the bulk of the text duplicated material found here. Wikipedia's copyright policy forbids the use of material from sources that do not expressly provide permission, carry licensing compatible with GFDL or qualify as public domain. If you choose to recreate the article, please ensure that the material is written in your own words. If you believe that using sentences from the source is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at the talk page of the new article and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License, or released into the public domain leave a note at the talk page of the new article with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the talk page of the article.


 * Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:58, 6 March 2008 (UTC)