User talk:Muslim lo Juheu

/work

March 2011
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on List of data recovery software‎‎. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Fleet Command (talk) 09:52, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Page titles
Just a note, if you link a page to itself (as you did by putting brackets around the title of Life skills-based education), all that does is bold the text. Page titles are already bold, so there's no need to do that there. In general, it's better to use bold text than links to bold text. Thanks! Bart133 t c @ 23:32, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I saw your last change to the page, and I did fix it wrongly. Thank you for correcting that. In general, Wikipedia articles have a bolded title in the first sentence - that one looks like it could be reformatted that way, to better fit the Wikipedia style. Thanks again, Bart133 t c @ 23:37, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Templates like merge and cleanup are about the most effective way to get experienced editors' attention. Categories for discussion can deal with the possibility of merging Category:Life skills and Category:Skills, even though I have a hard time believing that biting your elbow can be important in life. Bart133 t c @ 00:04, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Aerolit


The article Aerolit has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * A7 -- This article about a band does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 00:48, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Aerolit for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aerolit is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Aerolit until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 22:40, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Your example
Your example about Buffalo etc shows exactly what I did....list the blog as an external link, not using it as a source. The article is going to end up in AfD shortly anyway. Niteshift36 (talk) 23:22, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Floppy article invitation
Hi, you're invited in taking active part in editing/patrolling/reviewing Floppy disk hardware emulator. Hoping you'll enjoy it as you enjoed Floppy disk. Blackvisionit (talk) 04:54, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)