User talk:Muslimplayer75

May 2008
The recent edit you made to Islam by country constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. —Angelo De La Paz (talk) 11:23, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to British Asian constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. —Angelo De La Paz (talk) 11:24, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tum Tum
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Tum Tum, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? TubularWorld (talk) 19:05, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Thuwan Raheem
A tag has been placed on Thuwan Raheem requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. NuclearWarfare (talk) 00:56, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Asmeer Lathif Mohamed
A tag has been placed on Asmeer Lathif Mohamed requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. NuclearWarfare (talk) 00:57, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Edits to George W. Bush
Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sam Blacketer (talk) 20:42, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Duuuude bush can do anything he's the prez, and you shouldnt make those vandalizing edits, I dont like bush too, im a democrat i supported hillary in the 2008 election but you don' t see me throwing bad words at george's article. Mertozoro (talk) 04:00, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Edits to Abdul Kalam
Please stop vandalism. You may be blocked if this continues. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aki 27 (talk • contribs) 17:37, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

July 2008
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again (Evidence), you will be blocked from editing. Angelo De La Paz (talk) 09:28, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Calgary
This is also vandalism and has been reverted. The figures you used were made up and in the incorrect format, Canada uses C not F. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 22:16, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

warning
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. -- Rick Block (talk) 02:24, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Chitty (note)
Another editor has added the  template to the article Chitty (note), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Unusual? Quite TalkQu  20:53, 21 October 2008 (UTC)