User talk:Musteizer

September 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of oldest universities in continuous operation has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:20, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of oldest universities in continuous operation was changed by Musteizer (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.872797 on 2015-09-21T14:20:31+00:00.

Your recent editing history at List of oldest universities in continuous operation shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Thomas.W talk 17:08, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Musteizer, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

June 2022
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Dihya, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 12:11, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Dihya, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 12:33, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Dihya. M.Bitton (talk) 12:38, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked temporarily from editing to prevent further disruptive removal of material, as you did at Dihya. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Katietalk 13:15, 25 June 2022 (UTC)


 * @KrakatoaKatie, @Deepfriedokra, Since this user has been engaging in block evasion not even two hours into a mere 31 hour block, they don't seem to give a hoot for Wikipedias policies. Indef? Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 15:22, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Sockpuppet investigations/Musteizer -- Deep fried okra  ( talk ) 15:29, 25 June 2022 (UTC)