User talk:Mutaealim

Your submission at Articles for creation: St Clement's Church, Poole (September 4)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hammersoft were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:St Clement's Church, Poole and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:St_Clement%27s_Church,_Poole Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hammersoft&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:St_Clement%27s_Church,_Poole reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hammersoft (talk) 10:48, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: St Clement's Church, Poole (September 4)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hammersoft were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:St Clement's Church, Poole and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:St_Clement%27s_Church,_Poole Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hammersoft&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:St_Clement%27s_Church,_Poole reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hammersoft (talk) 18:11, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Mutaealim! Your additions to Draft:St Clement's Church, Poole have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Donating copyrighted materials.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:34, 4 September 2023 (UTC)


 * I didn't copy content, as far as I know... I rewrote it quite thoroughly. Correct me if I'm wrong.
 * This article has practically become null anyways, because this is an obscure church. There is no secondary source on it that I can find whatsoever, and it's a shame, because it lacks an article it needs. It's a beautiful little church I pass by often, and I have quite the interest in photographing and recording the histories of churches. Mutaealim (talk) 21:40, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
 * That's great, but not every church gets to have an article...even beautiful ones :) Find ones that are notable, and we'd welcome the article! (and photos!) --Hammersoft (talk) 22:00, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Some of the content was flagged as a potential copyright issue and was assessed by myself. Here is a link to the report. Click on the iThenticate link to view what was found by the detection service. — Diannaa (talk) 22:16, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:St Clement's Church, Poole
Hello, Mutaealim. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:St Clement's Church, Poole, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:07, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:St Clement's Church, Poole


Hello, Mutaealim. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "St Clement's Church".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:58, 4 March 2024 (UTC)