User talk:Mutoor1

Mutoor1 - Ms Viswanathan as per wiki list of films already has 580 plus films to his name. Also the films for which he was not credited but he did like that of his mentor who died need to be added. Also he composed music in Hindi, Kannada, Malyalam, Telugu as well. Many of the movies were made biligual. So it reaches to 1200.Lionbase1234 (talk) 17:15, 2 May 2013 (UTC) Mutoor1 you would be blocked if you continue reducing number of films which MSV has worked on. You can also listen to Jayalalitha speaking in Jaya TV function held in August 2012, available in youtube where total work done by MSV is 1200 films.Lionbase1234 (talk) 14:14, 1 June 2013 (UTC) Just hear Jayalalithaa's speech from 1 hour.15 minutes to 1 hr.38 she tells that MSV has worked in more than 1200 filmsLionbase1234 (talk) 14:19, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Lionbase 1234Chief minister, Mme Jayalalitha is no expert on subjects like this.Her speech writers also naturally check Wiki and report this false information that he has composed for 1200 films.In fact, not only her, several film news editors too have fallen trap to this, even an old hand like Randor Guy.Also M.S.Viswanathan never composed music for Hindi films, but Viswanathan Ramamoorthy's music had been adapted in 2 or 3 hindi films.Do not assume and make up facts and figures.Otherwise, make the list of the films with citations and proof

Mutoor1 - You are definitely not above Jayalalithaa. Also the 90 films which you say has only been composed by the duo of Vishwanathan and Ramamoorthy is wrong as they worked together in Hindi, Tamil, Telugu, Kannada and Malaylam as well. 90 must have been only Tamil films. MSV did composed music for Zulm Ki Zanjeer, a famous film in Hindi in 1989. You stop reverting articles with your own claims. Mnay of the movies were bilingual so tune was composed sometimes seperately and sometimes same tune but lyrics would be different. Already as per wiki list itself he has composed for 580 plus films. Also you are forgetting that before 1955, there were films where the duo were not creditd as ,usic directors. All films need to be included. When MSV himselves says in the Thirumbi Paarkiren episode aired in Jaya TV that he and Ramamoorthy worked in 400 films and that he after seperation has worked in such a way that today he stands as a composer of 1200 films.....how can you deny that?Lionbase1234 (talk) 09:42, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Lionbase 1234- Instead of claiming and guessing, you beteer start collecting data and record them and write into wiki.If you read the works by Mr.Vamanan, who has researched into Mellisai Mannargal has pointed out that they together did only 90 Tamil films.If you contest that, then produce a list showing more. Okay, I agree that you can consider the dubbed Film "Zulm Ki Zanjeer" in Hindi ( which was Ranuva Veeran in Tamil)to add to the number of films composed by MSV.Could you quote any original Hindi films or any other Hindi films ? MSV claims that he did compose for many songs in the films where S.M.Subbiah Naidu was the music composer.Nobody other than him had said so.If you are adding all that, then say on what basis are you adding all these films to the credit of MSV? Then you must also substract also the number of songs and films in which good composers like Govardhnam,G.K.Venkatesh, Shanker Ganesh, Henry Daniel,Joseph Krishna, etc as his assistants composed the music for many songs. Can you list the films (you say before 1955) in which Viswanathan Ramamoorthy duo were not credited for their own music with proof and citations?Please produce the relevant authentic data. You better ask MSV to produce the facts and figure if he did really say so in JAYA TV that he did 400 films with Ramamoorthy and he did a total of 1200 films.Or, you better make a proper study of this and then write into Wiki, which is today used for reference by many.You can only go for the facts which are available in the records, not with some speculations without any basis.

July 2013
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on M._S._Viswanathan. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ''Please do not indulge in removing / adding text back and forth as you did in the article. Please discuss the issues at Talk:M._S._Viswanathan point by point and come to CONCENSUS. If that is not happening, please approach WP:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard. Edit warring does not help at all.'' Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 06:18, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

July 2013
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on M._S._Viswanathan. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ''Please do not indulge in removing / adding text back and forth as you did in the article. Please discuss the issues at Talk:M._S._Viswanathan point by point and come to CONCENSUS. If that is not happening, please approach WP:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard. Edit warring does not help at all.''Lionbase1234 (talk) 16:55, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.