User talk:Muwatallis II/Archive 1

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia!

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 23:45, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

3RR warning
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.--Caminoderoma (talk) 17:55, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Spanish American wars of independence. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Favonian (talk) 21:10, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Edit war notice
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Spanish American wars of independence. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Rosalina2427   (talk to me)  21:12, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Continued warring at Capture of the Esmeralda
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:45, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

New Edit warring about British
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.

--Caminoderoma (talk) 14:52, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at Spanish American wars of independence. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:38, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Edit war
You are now edit warring and vandalizing the said subjects regarding the British Legions. Use consesus only.Eastfarthingan (talk) 14:44, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Sandbox articles
Hello Muwatallis II, concering the articles you are preparing it would be of much use to add inline citations, rather than just having a raw list of sources. Doing so will not only bring the articles to the standard that is expected for good Wikipedia articles but also help me and others to add up further material or make changes.

Currently I am struggling to improve the article Cunco people, but I find the sources very scant. Maybe you can help? Dentren |  Ta lk  12:14, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of Reynogüelén (disambiguation)


A tag has been placed on Battle of Reynogüelén (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Barkeep49 (talk) 22:34, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Campaignbox Franco-Spanish wars
Template:Campaignbox Franco-Spanish wars has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 07:53, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Cape St. Vincent (1606)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Cape St. Vincent (1606) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 06:21, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Cape St. Vincent (1606)
The article Battle of Cape St. Vincent (1606) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Battle of Cape St. Vincent (1606) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 09:01, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Cape St. Vincent (1606)
The article Battle of Cape St. Vincent (1606) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Cape St. Vincent (1606) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 16:21, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Edit war notice
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on British intervention in Spanish American independence. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Eastfarthingan (talk) 17:40, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Disambiguation link notification for February 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Raid on Nassau (1720), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fort Nassau ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Raid_on_Nassau_%281720%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Raid_on_Nassau_%281720%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:56, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Neutrals
What are your doubts about the neutral countries involved? Explain yourself better. I give you the example of the United States and the Republic of Florida. I think that it is better to bring it together both in the USA, which has annexed the territory, than to put the Republic of Florida separately. --Pacopepe 50 (talk) 17:36, 16 April 2020 (UTC)