User talk:Muxammiliqbal

July 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Qaim Ali Shah, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 17:58, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Qaim Ali Shah. bonadea contributions talk 18:01, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  18:15, 27 July 2016 (UTC)