User talk:Muziekfan

You can leave a message here. Thanks. --Muziekfan 14:25, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! STTW (talk)  18:54, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Duetto buffo di due gatti
Hi

This isn't a choral composition, is it? It's a duet (i.e. 2 singers). I thought I'd flag this up with you in case you can convince me that it's choral before I revert your addition of the category. Incidentally, I am the Andrew Cooper who contributed the post to opera-l that's referenced at the bottom, and one of these days I'm going to rewrite the article so that it's based on Osborne's note. Best. --GuillaumeTell 17:06, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * OK. I've changed it, although it is also performed by the choir Les Petits Chanteurs à la Croix de Bois (CD: Le plus belles Chansons, as Le Duo des Chats) and used as vocal (training) piece for choirs. But you're right, it's a duet. I have added other categories, not just songs. --Muziekfan 22:35, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I've now listed the components of the duet in the text with a ref to Osborne's book. Categories are rather a problem.  The rather odd Category:Pieces is sort of relevant (unless "miau" is a word), but there's no Category:Duets, so I deleted that.  Possibly there ought to be a category for duets - and you can create one if you want to - but it would need to have more than one item in it.  The only other relevant Wikipedia article that I can find is The Flower Duet - otherwise it's groups, albums, films and references within articles (e.g. opera synopses) to duets.  The whole Songs area is rather a mess, category-wise. --GuillaumeTell 18:57, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Ciskederat.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ciskederat.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ilse@ 09:56, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I have added a fair-use rationale to all my images. I thought the rationale within the summary was sufficient. --Muziekfan 10:12, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * For me: Deletion of all fair use images of living people. --Muziekfan 16:40, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)