User talk:Mvnaidu88

Proposed deletion of M Venkat Naidu
Hello, Mvnaidu88. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, M Venkat Naidu, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want M Venkat Naidu to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Αηαмοι-αscιι002 (ταικ) 11:41, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of M Venkat Naidu


A tag has been placed on M Venkat Naidu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Phileasson (talk) 13:41, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Gorlepeta. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. ''. Also, it may be worth drafting in userspace first for new articles.'' Widefox ; talk 08:58, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Mvnaidu88


A tag has been placed on User:Mvnaidu88 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Widefox ; talk 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest
Hello, Mvnaidu88. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Gorlepeta, you may have a conflict of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --Mr. Guye (talk) 22:55, 21 May 2014 (UTC)