User talk:Mvolljdqw

More hockey stats
Hello Mark! You helped me out last time in my quest for stats from many years ago in the NHL and I was wondering if you can help me out again for the 1950-51 NHL season. Google has failed me again and so have a few other sites I use regularly. First, I need help finding the rest of the stats for a goaltender named Al Rollins (minutes played, goals against (not average), and shut outs). Secondly, (i Know I am asking a lot) the playoff matchups between the Bruins vs. Leafs and Canadiens vs. Red Wings. All the tables are built, it is just a matter of pluggin in information, which I can't find. I would keep looking on the net (I assume that if I keep on looking, I will find the right info eventually), but I have to go to work now and don't have time. Thanks! Masterhatch 26 August 2005


 * I found Al Rollins' regular season stats, but I don't have any information on the playoffs. --93JC 18:47, August 27, 2005 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Masterhatch 28 August 2005

Intresting Ayyavazhi Family
Hai Mark, there are intresting articles about Ayyavazhi, a new religion on both mythology and religiosity. Wikipedia is rich with this topic in English, but poor in other languages. Since french is a leading language in Wikipedia it is better to translate the contents on this AYYAVAZHI family to french. - Paul Raj

Dodge Spirit replacement
Alright, I did my research, and it turns out the Spirit was the designated replacement for the Aries, while the Shadow was made to replace the Omni. If you don't believe me, check out these links...

http://www.allpar.com/eek/k/kron.html http://www.allpar.com/model/sundance.html

--ApolloBoy 23:58, 10 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Check your discussion page for my reply. 93JC 02:12, 11 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Hey, I was trying to tell you guys but somebody kept on putting Shadow replaces aries back in. --matador300 20:59, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Excuse me...
Why are you reverting my changes to the list of Chrysler platforms? The term "sport compact" is widely accepted by many auto enthusiasts, and a search for the term on Google turns up 5,510,000 hits! I'd like to know why you object to me using that term. --ApolloBoy 01:38, 30 November 2005 (UTC)


 * It's widely accepted by the pubescent ricers who use the term. No one, and I mean no one else uses the term. Except as a pejorative.
 * Beyond that it is, above all, ambiguous. There is no clear, concise definition. Even the "sport compact" article itself begins with a section entitled "Classification & debate". Coupé on the other hand begins with this:
 * "A coupé (from the French for "cut") or coupe is a car with a close-coupled interior offering either two seats or 2+2 seating."
 * Fits Talon/Laser and Daytona/Laser to a tee. That's why I keep changing it back. --93JC 04:35, 1 December 2005 (UTC)


 * And if you take a table like that, what as wrong with the AMC specifcations( otherthan it

looked awful) --matador300 21:04, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

About your Pontiac Phoenix pic...
Hi there, I saw the new Pontiac Phoenix image you uploaded. I am aware of the issues with my pic, but you may go ahead and replace my pic with yours. Besides, yours is of better quailty LOL --ApolloBoy 02:38, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Alrighty. :) --93JC 02:46, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting the strange vandalism to my userpage. =) --ApolloBoy 01:16, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * No problem. I've been watching 216.20.113.244 and 24.63.10.62 like a hawk, reverting any vandalism they'd performed (mostly changing table heading colours in automotive articles, as you've undoubtedly noticed). I guess Mr. 216.20.113.244 noticed you had been changing them back too, and decided it would be funny to make stupid, vandalistic edits to your user page.--93JC 22:07, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

Infobox Automobile changes
FYI, as noted in the discussion page, I have changed the syntax for Template:Infobox Automobile in a few areas: "engine" and "body_style" are no longer plural; "shares_with" has become "related"; and "similar_cars" is now just "similar". Thanks for your contributions! --SFoskett 14:51, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Got it chief.--93JC 20:49, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

GM Minivans
Hi, I was wondering if you would support me in the discussion to keep the GM minivans separate, rather than merge them with the Chevrolet Lumina APV and Chevrolet Venture articles. I'd really appreciate your help ans support. -Bavaria 17:36, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Important WikiProject Automobiles Discussion
Hello! As a WikiProject Automobiles member, I just thought you might want to input your opinions on an important discussion we're currently having about whether articles regarding similar vehicles should be merged into one or split by brand. If you would like to comment or read further, please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Automobiles. Thank you in advance for your thoughts and feedback. Airline 23:15, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Linking Dates
Hi! I noticed you re-wikified some non specific dates on Chevrolet Corsica. I just wanted to draw your attention to WP:CONTEXT and WP:MOSDATE, both of which recommend only specific dates (or those with special context) be linked. Just thought you should know, to save your effort in future. I was linking dates myself until someone told me. Best wishes, Rockpocket 04:07, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Good to know, thanks. --93JC 04:10, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

stampede city boy
hey, where do you live? I grew up in calgary, left in 68 just before it turned from mudhole cowtown to prairie metropolis. spent all my time in SW calgary. Gzuckier 18:09, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Request for comments on article naming
Talk:World Junior Ice Hockey Championships If you're interested. Thanks. ColtsScore 09:20, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Eagle Premier automotive flops
Please don't just delete this. It's not POV, it is quite verifiable from the other WP Pages. Please edit as you see fit, but the Premier was the most important Eagle car, and also the most important for Chrysler. I'll be looking for your version of this edit.

"At enormous expense, a new design and state of the art plant for created for the Eagle Premier which was far more advanced than K-car or Taurus derivatives, which unfortunatlely Americans preferred to continue to buy droves. The plans and factory would however be Chrysler's starting point for the highly successful LH sedans."

--matador300 19:31, 6 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Please... "far more advanced than K-car or Taurus derivatives, which unfortunately Americans preferred to continue to buy in droves" is blatant POV. I have no idea why you're on this great crusade to make the Premier out to be the automotive messiah, but frankly I think everyone at the Automobiles Wikiproject is getting tired of it. Your wildly speculative assertions have no place here. You want to rant and rave about how great the Premier and AMC were, and how the Matador is a direct predecessor to the current Chrysler 300 and Dodge Charger/Magnum, fine: start a blog. Or join an automotive forum. Until you start substantiating your heretofore dubious (dare I say bogus) claims take it somewhere else. --93JC 20:20, 6 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The premier article pretty much verifies the claim that the Premier is the basis for the LH. If you can't state how removing this statement improves the article, then you are vandalizing by removing valid content. Your claim of POV is wrong, it's exactly why the premier failed, nobody cared, they kept buying more primitive cars. Now please leave the poor Premier alone. --matador300 20:58, 7 July 2006 (UTC)


 * You edited the Premier article, jackass. God you're full of shit... --93JC 03:55, 8 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The article is also correct, and I'm full of facts, and your full of something else.--matador300 06:05, 9 July 2006 (UTC)


 * If you're so full of facts how about you show a shred of proof? Back up your facts by citing them. --93JC 16:06, 9 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Speaking of facts, I didn't write this article:

Brampton Assembly From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search Brampton Assembly is a DaimlerChrysler automobile factory in Brampton, Ontario, Canada. The factory was opened by American Motors in 1986 as Bramalea Assembly, a state-of-the-art facility specifically designed to produce the Eagle Premier. It was acquired (along with the rest of AMC) by Chrysler in August 1987. Production of the Chrysler LH platform cars began in June 1992 and continued with the updated LH cars in 1997. Production switched to the rear-wheel drive Chrysler LX platform cars in January 2004.

The nearby Brampton Satellite Stamping plant opened in 1991.

[edit] Products 1988-1992 Eagle Premier 1990-1992 Dodge Monaco 1993-2004 Chrysler Concorde 1993-2004 Dodge Intrepid 1993-1997 Eagle Vision 1994-2001 Chrysler LHS 1994-1996 Chrysler New Yorker 1999-2004 Chrysler 300M 2005-present Chrysler 300 2005-present Dodge Magnum 2006-present Dodge Charger [edit] AMC

Now repeat after me, the previous large AMC car before the Premier was....

I believe an apology is due.... I have officially added you to my list of "bad guys". --matador300 07:19, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

AMC collectibles
So what's the REAL problem with that page? Somehow I don't think your edits were truly made in good faith. You realize that edits not made in good faith are in ... bad faith, right?? But in my short experience with WPers, it seems there's an awful lot of that going around and it's pretty much tolerated. --matador300 06:05, 9 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The "REAL" problem with that page is spelled out in the deletion notice at the top of the page: the subject does not merit having an article in Wikipedia. What is particularly notable about AMC collectibles? Over any other car collectibles? Jack squat, therefore it should be deleted. --93JC 15:49, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Sir, I suspect you harbor ill will towards my self and my contributions. Toy collecting is something that I do, and I take offence if you imply that the Hot Wheels Openfire is somehow less deserving of an article than the original AMC Gremlin. Do you also advocate deleting all articles about toys, and that Congress ban the publication of books and magazine on toy collecting? Do you have any expertise, knowledge, or credentials with regard to toy collecting? I suspect you do not own even one toy car, if you do please correct my impression. Please take your knocking down of other people's sandcastles elsewhere where you are better appreciated, and not causing hard feelings. --matador300 20:07, 9 July 2006 (UTC).
 * Who cares if 93JC doesn't have any "credentials" in the way of toy collecting (do they even exist?), what matters is that you don't seem to understand the concept of notability. Read this policy, and you'll soon see what we're getting at. Also, nobody has "sandcastles" at Wikipedia, because nobody owns an article, even ones that you created. Now stop trying to portray us as antagonists and understand Wikipedia policies throughly. --ApolloBoy 20:27, 9 July 2006 (UTC)


 * I used to have hundreds of toy cars. What that has to do with the matter at hand is completely beyond me. Read Notability. Then read Notability again. And again, if you still haven't gotten the point: AMC TOYS ARE NOT NOTABLE. You want to write an article about toy cars? Fine, make one about ALL CARS, not just AMC cars. No one gives a shit about AMC toys, specifically. --93JC 22:33, 9 July 2006 (UTC)


 * "No one gives a shit about AMC toys, specifically". Actually, that is a verifiably false statement. You just made that up without thinking, didn't you? I am living proof of the existence of somebody who cares about AMC cars because that is a specialty field of mine, and for example, I can tell you that nobody ever made a toy of an ambassador. By the way, by using the word "shit" in a disrespectful manner, you are violating civility rules I believe, which leads me to believe your actions may not be in good faith, and deleting content not in good faith is vandalism.


 * Nothing in the passage you pointed me to bans the creation of a page that maps real cars to their replicas. The fact that classic auto magazines specifically mention certain models of replicas means that they are verifiable not only from their existence on web page listings, but also in printed magazines.


 * There is an article on Hot Wheels, and one on Matchbox. Why is the existence of a Hot Wheels Packin Pacer any less notable than a full size Pack Pacer? Where is the rule that a full size car merits a note, but a toy that fetches $5,000 on ebay is not worth noting?


 * I am sorry to say that unless I see a change in attitude, I must categorize both 93JC and Apolloboy as "bad guys" and I must treat you accordingly. --matador300 07:29, 10 July 2006 (UTC)


 * I'm quaking in my boots. Let's set things straight:
 * 1) I don't censor my comments for the protection of your virgin ears. Shit piss fuck cunt cocksucker motherfucker tits.
 * 2) You're treading a few wikipedia rules yourself.
 * A peace offering: you write your car toy articles. If you can make them expansive, depthful articles I'll leave them alone. If they all turn out to be short lists they'll probably end up deleted anyway. By the same token, I expect you to learn to articulate your thoughts without being blatantly biased ("[The Eagle Premier was] far more advanced than K-car or Taurus derivatives, which unfortunately Americans preferred to continue to buy in droves" for example is POV. Remove 'unfortunately', as it is blatantly biased to the Premier, and 'far more advanced', as it is speculative and subjective, and you might have a NPOV phrase).
 * Fair? --93JC 17:39, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * "I must categorize both 93JC and Apolloboy as "bad guys" and I must treat you accordingly."
 * That IS NOT the way to behave on Wikipedia. If you get to the point where you categorize people as "bad guys", maybe you should relax and take a break. It does a body good... --ApolloBoy 18:10, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah? Well heck geez darn it all tarnation to you all too. The bit about far more advanced was written by persons other than me (even though the Premier is one of the few cars even more obscure than the matador, it too eviddently as a fan base). I will try to reference articles to actual mentions in collecting books and magazines if it helps. A non-notable topic does not draw editors, so it says, so could you pleeez just give it a chance. There are certainly many mor popular cars that don't have collectible articles yet, so whether or not nobody gives a flying fart about AMC should not be a determining measure of "of note". Plus I hope the car article people don't start exercising  their clout over the poor little worthless toy car pages. --matador300 20:56, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Cavalier
What is your problem man? It says that Monza and Chevette covered Chevy sales until Cavalier. How does that say Cavalier does not replace Chevette? Can you even find one citation to directly support your unverifiable original research that the Chevette was not replaced by the Cavalier? What 4 door sedan or wagon did the Cavalier replace? They replaced the 5-door and 4 door chevette,that's what. I give you a citation and you invert the thesis. What car was the entry level US -built chevy?? Chevette. After Cavalir, what was US built entry level car? Cavalier. Why are you standing on this, it makes no sense, is somebody paying you to hold your unverifiable view? If people are this daft, it's no wonder I upset people. --matador300 19:35, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Oh, you're the guy that figured out this bit of WP OR?? No wonder --matador300 19:37, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Dodge Spirit replacement Alright, I did my research, and it turns out the Spirit was the designated replacement for the Aries, while the Shadow was made to replace the Omni. If you don't believe me, check out these links...

http://www.allpar.com/eek/k/kron.html http://www.allpar.com/model/sundance.html

--ApolloBoy 23:58, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * That was an old comment I made a long time ago when I didn't know so much about Wikipedia and why Allpar is considered an unreliable source. --ApolloBoy 20:42, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh Artie...
 * The entry-level Chevrolet before Cavalier: Chevette.
 * The entry-level Chevrolet after Cavalier debuted: Chevette
 * The entry-level Chevrolets after 1984: Sprint & Chevette
 * The entry-level Chevrolet after 1987: Sprint, until the Geo nameplate came into existence
 * The Edmunds article states the Cavalier replaced Monza. Just Monza. Monza replaced Vega. Just Vega. The entire article is built around the Vega -> Monza -> Cavalier ->Cobalt lineage. They mention the Chevette a grand total of once, stating the Cavalier was "above the decrepit Chevette". Besides, since you're so keen on EPA size classes, look them up: Chevette was subcompact, while Cavalier was compact. --93JC 19:53, 26 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Go look at the talk again. Six articles. Everybody but you agrees the lineage of small chevys is Corvair, Vega / Monza, Chevette, and then Cavalier, including the Edmunds article you claim proves that the hatchback/notchback/4 dr/ wagon Cavalier only replaced the coupe Monza. You do know the Monza was a Mustang II mini-pony car right? It was absolutely not a 4 door family sedan. That was the Chevette's job. Is here some other lineage I should know about? You were aware of this lineage,  I hope. Or perhaps you dispute it. You can knock it off now and save yourself further humiliation, or I shall be forced to go to a real library and check out or buy a real book, and see who comes out on top. How could a car become a #1 seller in the US if it only replaced a sporty 2 door Mustang II competitor, instead of the entire Vega niche, which was mostly occupied by Chevette?? If I end up completely or mostly right, what would you do?? This is precisely how really silly information gets into WP and becomes impossible to fix because of stubborn folks like you, like the F-14 guy. --matador300 22:01, 26 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Six "articles". Six anecdotes, one of which proves me right, one which calls them "import fighters", one which infers they were both cheap, one written by an amateur, one that infers they were outdated, and one that isn't an article at all. --93JC 23:01, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Contact
93JC, would you mind please shooting me an e-mail using the "E-mail this user" tool on my talk page? Thanks. Scheinwerfermann 17:38, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:1991DodgeSpiritES.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:1991DodgeSpiritES.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) (random) 20:53, 31 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Meh, whatever. Delete it, I don't really give a shit. --93JC 02:35, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Wikiproject Automobiles Notification
Hi 93JC, you were on the list of members at WikiProject Automobiles and we are introducing a new way of listing members, as the old list was becoming too long. Our new method involves having all of our members in a category.

To add yourself to the category just add the userbox to your user page by putting   where you want the userbox. Alternatively if you don't like the userbox you can add   to your userpage.

If you no longer wish to be a member of the project, simply don't add the userbox or category, there's no pressure. Thanks for your time, James086Talk 04:52, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Ice Hockey Project discussion of hockey player notability and project scope
Please come join the WikiProject Ice Hockey Notability standards for hockey players discussion. I'd like to see input from all our project members who have an opinion. Thanks! ColtsScore 00:14, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:AtlantaFlamesFlamingA.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:AtlantaFlamesFlamingA.PNG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Unspecified source for Image:AtlantaFlamesFlamingA.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:AtlantaFlamesFlamingA.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:56, 16 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Automotive article photos
Hi, 93JC. I'm trying to move the ball forward on this topic and hold namecalling and invective to a minimum here on WPA. If you have a moment and can add your thoughts, the odds of a productive outcome would likely improve. Thanks. —Scheinwerfermann (talk) 22:35, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Seals seasons
Hello Mark. I just wanted to say that you have done some really great work on the NHL Seals seasons. I am impressed with the way you had all the trades outlined too. Nicely done Maple Leaf (talk) 00:32, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the pat on the back, it's very much appreciated. The Seals are a particularly tough team to research as they had very poor media coverage throughout their existence. The trades took a long time to compile, going through my copy of Total Hockey for the better part of a day. Hopefully I and others will get a chance to expand the content on the pages beyond the stats and trades. 93JC (talk) 01:57, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

1963 NHL Amateur Draft
As you seem to be the editor originally converting the NHL drafts to a tabled format I thought I would drop you a note. I've been cleaning up some of the NHL Draft pages and after fully converting the 1963 Amateur draft to wikitable I wanted to ask if this is the color you were going for? If so I'll continue to update the others in the series. If not please suggest a color more appropriate. Slysplace   talk   ♫  19:30, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Disregard, I've changed the color to something a bit darker, Matched it to the 2008 Draft and think I'll continue on this path for consistency sake Slysplace    talk   ♫  23:29, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

NHL standings templates
Didn't know I was reverting, as I created most of the Template namespace standings files, mostly from NHL seasons articles. This has been discussed at WT:HOCKEY. Bolding is the convention we use. We need to follow convention more, not less. Look over the vast majority of standings and that is what is in place. As for sorting, this was discussed also. It is most useful for the goals for/against and PIM categories. No sorting on the games played. Admittedly for some of the times when divisions were small, it doesn't mean much. Alaney2k (talk) 20:13, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

The Diacritics
I'm enjoying the discussion at WikiProject Ice hockey. However, I can't get too involved as my reputation is destroyed. Hopefully (someday) all dios will be eliminated. GoodDay (talk) 19:44, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The pro-diacritics arguments are just so bafflingly obtuse it's difficult to put into words! "But, but, if you don't include the diacritics then you'll screw up the pronunciation! The diacritics make it a totally different letter! Wah wah wah!" I'm all for including the native spelling in the lead (e.g. "Sandis Ozolinsh (Sandis Ozoliņš; ; born August 3, 1972) is a Latvian ice hockey player", etc.), but to have the foreign spelling overrule the COMMONLY ACCEPTED ENGLISH SPELLING is absolutely ridiculous. As if you or I have a fucking clue to how pronounce ņ anyway! 93JC (talk) 19:59, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Indeed. It's good to see you & others continuing the argument, as I tended to get too passionate about the topic. GoodDay (talk) 20:05, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Djssaso stance of English version is the wrong way & insulting is as immovable as my stance of Use the English version, no exceptions. GoodDay (talk) 15:58, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:AtlantaFlamesFlamingA.PNG
 Thanks for uploading File:AtlantaFlamesFlamingA.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.


 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.


 * If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.


 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:49, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

WP:Hockey Navbox policy
Since you spoke up in my recent thread, I ask that you please check User:TonyTheTiger/sandbox/Hockey mafia issue and make sure that I am representing WP:HOCKEY correctly.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:16, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Cam-in-block for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cam-in-block is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cam-in-block until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:18, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)