User talk:Mvpeach

March 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Legotech &middot;( t )&middot;( c ) 06:05, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising or promotion. - Eldereft ~(s)talk~ 06:51, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Macy (talk) 19:52, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Macy (talk) 20:09, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

I cannot imagine how anyone could consider that my editing would be considered vandalizing. I have sent an email explaining my position and await your reply. Thank you. MVPeach

I have sent two emails to the person who is chastising me asking for guidance, but whoever it is has ignored my requests and continues to treat my additions as something she calls vandalizing. This is absurd. I guess this procedure is flawed or the people who are doing the oversight are just abusive. I really don't understand the stonewalling.

Your recent addition to Age disparity in sexual relationships is a copy-and-paste from http://barbaralebey.blogspot.com/2008/01/cougars-whole-new-meaning.html Therefore this is a violation of that person's copyright. I appreciate your good intentions and your desire to contribute, but material added to the Wikipedia must be your original words. Herostratus (talk) 18:06, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

re your emai
Hi mvpeach. First of all, let me congratulate you for not being scared off. If you want to cite a web page, you can use the cite web template. This typically would be used thus:

"...blah blah blah blah blah blah..."

For books there is a cite book template, used similarly, and similar templates for journals etc.

Citations would be to reliable sources. Generally speaking a blog is not a reliable source, but this depends on what is being cited. Peer-reviewed serious journals are best, but obviously not available for many subjects.

Further questions, please don't hesitate to message me.

Cheers and happy wikiing, Herostratus (talk) 02:44, 8 April 2008 (UTC)