User talk:Mw66

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

Nice contribution to the Krazy Kat article. -- llywrch 20:57 13 Jul 2003 (UTC)
 * Thanks very much. mw66

Thanks for the help, I appreciate it. Annette Heinemeyer

saw your comment - why not write the article in a WP, and then just copy to the enc, or alternatively, add it in chunks, so you don't exceed the inactivity time? You can always add a still working comment to minimise interference. jimfbleak 07:03, 18 Oct 2003 (UTC)

--- Re:Films considered the worst ever You and I got an edit conflict, and I couldn't figure out what you had changed. Checking the page history, it appears there were multiple reversions of various changes made by many different people, and I can't figure out what, if anything, was lost. If I reverted something of yours, it was not deliberate. Tuf-Kat 06:39, Oct 21, 2003 (UTC)


 * Hey TUFKAT, no biggie! :-) mw66

--- hi mw. was looking at the Asano Tadanobu page; i wrote the imdb bio, so anything you wanna take from there is fair game. i could do it myself, but i feel bad just wholesale replacing anything without a stub message. should probably also inc. a line explaining that he's in so many movies because he doesnt (point of principle) do TV, which is rare bc japanese actors make more money doing tv than film.

Nateji77 18:52, 13 Feb, 2003 (UTC)


 * done and done.
 * Nateji77 23:39, 22 Feb 2004 (UTC)

--- Hey, I see you have some interest in Silent Hill as well. Do you think my contribution to the artical is of any value? I see you've deleted some of my writing, so I was just wondering. Loui Da Boss

I saw that you deleted most of my writing about the music in Silent Hill, as well as the atmosphere within it (e.g. the describition of the otherworld). Why? What is it that you want with this article if not to describe what the game is actually like and what it's about?Loui Da Boss

Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
 * Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
 * Multi-Licensing Guide
 * Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the " " template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:


 * Option 1
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR
 * Option 2
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions to any U.S. state, county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace " " with "  ". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Sh3.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Sh3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 17:36, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Rama copy.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rama copy.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:58, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)