User talk:Mwagner24

Welcome
Hi,. This is NOT some automated message...it's from a real person. You can talk to me right now. Welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed you've just joined, and wanted to give you a few tips to get you started. If you have any questions, please talk to us. The tips below should help you to get started. Best of luck!  Chzz  ►  20:21, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Nauset ball
Hi, welcome to Wikipedia. See WP:FIRST for an idea of what we're looking for in your first article, Nauset ball. Someone suggested that we delete the article, but I've declined the deletion for now, since I see at least 6 Google hits from school websites that suggest the name and sport is legitimate. I'll have another look later. - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 20:22, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nauset ball
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Nauset ball, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails notability. Only 26 Google hits, and none of them meet the standard of significant coverage in reliable independent sources. (In fact, half of them seem to be old cached mentions of the fact that a Nauset ball article was deleted by PROD in 2007.) No mentions in an all-dates search of Google news, either.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Dawn Bard (talk) 15:50, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Nauset ball
I have nominated Nauset ball, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Nauset ball. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ThaddeusB (talk) 14:30, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fantex


The article Fantex has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Without any primary or third party reliable sources this article seems to violate WP:Advertising and WP:Note. I was unable to find additional sources to add to the article. If sources can be found, please add them to the page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 22:27, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fantex
Hello Mwagner24,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Fantex for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 13:54, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fantex


The article Fantex has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This is an advertisement dressed as an article. There is nothing to distinguish this company from many other similar companies, no evidence of notability, no justification for being the subject of an encyclopedia article. Specifically, the article fails WP:ORG and WP:ARTSPAM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Andyjsmith (talk) 22:16, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Fantex for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fantex is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Fantex until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Andyjsmith (talk) 22:39, 24 September 2015 (UTC)